How +- charges can explain Lorentz Force
Uploader Comments (definitionofis)
Video Responses
All Comments (12)
-
I've been looking at H for quite awhile. It would take a pretty large unit to get 3 liters of O and 6 of H. I'm not suggesting there would be any improvement in fuel efficiency. I just figure if H is generated, you might as well feed it back into the engine. There might be easier ways to make pure O. I do think an Oxygen feeder would be a cool accessory on a car though.
-
@joewilder I wonder if that would be a huge amount of gas. I would calculate that first.
-
@definitionofis Well, thanks for what you've done. I get lots of ideas, but don't have a workshop. Lately I've been thinking about a person I know that needs oxygen and he likes to drive a lot. It would be good to have a water splitter incorporated into his car. The Hydrogen could be fed to the fuel system and Oxygen could be fed to my friend.
-
@joewilder I probably won't do another video about magnetism for a while, although I still have radio wave geometry, and permanent magnet atomic structure, which I would like to integrate into this framework. I have these aspects of electromagnetism too compartmentalized in my brain. They should be linked.
I have to get back to my wind turbine battery charging circuit. I neglected it because I rarely have wind. haha: The wind turbine just made four complete turns.
watch the TalkingToleedskalnin channel vids and tell me what you think. Perhaps what I was trying to suggest in my first comment will make sense. Then again , perhaps not. I got the sense that the experiments you were doing were heading in that direction, perhaps not intentionally though. And yes the foundations come first. i look forward to your response.
subbvert 1 month ago in playlist More videos from definitionofis
@subbvert You will like this live demonstration of electromagnetic attraction because it matches one of your videos: watch?v=mHp_Wp5dAb8
I deliberately stayed away from permanent magnets in my videos because I am not sure if magnetism is a property of material. Maybe magnetism is an expression of aligned revolving electron charge, around billions of atom nuclei. Some metals are better able to perma-hold that spin alignment than others. There is no magneton flow. It is all +- charges.
definitionofis 1 month ago
I've just watched your vids on magnetism and both enjoyed and gained a lot from them.Your experiments lead me to think you are looking to harness the formal properties of the N/S di-pole thinking in a new (more efficient)way ie circular flux, What about combining the concepts, closing the N/S circuit into a monopole that would then display the efficiencies of the circular flux? I've seen theoretical schematics of this and wondered what your thoughts are? Many thanks.
subbvert 1 month ago in playlist More videos from definitionofis
@subbvert First we learn a foundation from established science (8.02 MIT, Stanford, nptelhrd, Yale videos) so we have a way of quickly seeing a new idea's worth. Youtube has too much guessing by those who do not first understand the basic principles. They waste time winding odd coils. There are no N/S poles nor monopoles. 1800s comparisons to neg-pos monopoles is tempting and is a dead end, I think. The 18 DePalma videos, Lloyd Bushman was fascinating though. I am still thinking.
definitionofis 1 month ago
I think maybe your calculations should also including the greater distance between diagonals which is sqrt(2) greater and since the forces go with 1/d^2 it would make that diagonal force half as important.
sjh7132 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@sjh7132 You're right. I'll correct that with an annotation.
definitionofis 1 month ago