http://rtvm.gov.ph - Presentation of Credentials of H.E. Archbishop Msgr.Guiseppe Pinto

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,455
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 22, 2011

Malacañang Palace
22 July 2011


H.E Archbishop Guiseppe Pinto presented his credentials to President Benigno S. Aquino III as the new Papal Nuncio to the Philippines. Pinto replaced Edward Joseph Adams who was reassigned to Greece after his 3 years stay in the country.

As the new Apostolic Nuncio, Archbishop Guiseppe Pinto will be actively involved in strengthening ties between the Pope and the President as well as the local bishops. Pinto was last assigned as the Apostolic Nuncio to Chile.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • OUR NATION IS SUPPOSED TO BE A SECULAR STATE, and I am very disappointed with our government (including previous Administrations) for allowing Religion to influence our government's decision-making.

    Roman Catholic Church should stop interfering with our state's affairs and must end its politicking gimmick.

    Faith-based laws and policies undermine and threatens the RIGHTS OF EVERYONE!

    SUPPORT THE RH BILL NOW!!!

  • @Shlomayo

    My comment aroused from diplomatic relation of the PH to the Vatican which led me to speak against the Church's interference to our government.. So Im pretty sure I understand exactly what this video really means..

    The concept of "Human Rights" never came from any religion.

    Human Rights came from people who argued, from people who reasoned, and from people who thought it out thoroughly.

    Religion is the biggest stumbling block against human rights, specially against women's rights.

see all

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Shlomayo

    Cont..

    Once again, you have tried to pull my focus into another issue and ended into failure, I wont allow you to escape me without proving your absurd asserted misleading claims, WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?

    "Holy Inquisition - gave us the modern legal system - most advanced judicial system" --- "the drafting of UN Human Rights is based from Catholic faith"

    Proof proof proof... WHERE IS IT???

    If you cannot prove it. There is nothing to be ashamed of in withdrawing ridiculous statements.

  • @Shlomayo

    Cont..

    Despite the fact that I never questioned your credibility and never attacked your "Major" in History, for I know that it is unwise and unjust for me to downgrade and undermine someone's personality and education, and for the sake of keeping this conversation as healthy as much as possible, and now, you will resort to making personal insults as a desperate way to salvage your losing arguments?

    Cont..

  • @Shlomayo

    Cont..

    Since from the very start, you have been declaring misleading claims, claims that are very misleading to people.

    I gave you plenty of chance to prove your claims but all you did in return is give junks, lies, dishonesty, and now, insults.

    Cont..

  • @Shlomayo

    Cont..

    Further, I never mention the Human Dignity as an object of study of any natural science, quit making dirty tricks and stop putting words into my mouth.

    I only mentioned several branches of natural sciences to emphasize to you the Human Evolution's social and political aspects.

    Cont..

  • @Shlomayo

    "because wikipedia says something is innate makes it so"

    Wikipedia says it so and just like what I said, Human Dignity is innate SIMPLY because that is what people believe. You may think of it as "irrational" but there is nothing you can do about it for it is the truth.

    Cont...

  • @AtheistsAreSkeptics I see no point in entertaining your genetic fallacies. If you want to know what that means: crack open a dictinionary.

  • @AtheistsAreSkeptics The question was human dignity: this is - if claimed as something innate and objectively existent - is not part of any natural science: it is not something that can be empirically tested, observed and proven. Thus why I pointed out that it is not part of evolutionary biology which - according to the proper methodology - is still empirical.

  • @AtheistsAreSkeptics So because wikipedia says something is innate makes it so? That is then the philosophical basis for your "reasonability" - wikipedia?

    Atheists from the Philippines seem to be a very bad copy of European/American atheists. lol

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more