Why King James Bible Only? Bible Questions with Michael Pearl - Episode 027

This Weeks Bible Question: Why do you only use the King James Bible?

http://www.nogreaterjoy.org Bible Questions with Michael Pearl. A weekly show that answers all questions about the bible - but don't come looking for his opinion - because only the Word of God will suffice. Taking away the mysticism of what the Bible says we present to you some questions most every American Christian has - along with stranger topics like angels, wizards, giants, and creation. Submit your question to biblequestions@nogreaterjoy.org or call and leave a brief question at (931) 805-4820

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• michael pearl
• debi pearl
• king james bible
• jesus christ

[forhisglory723]

I personally enjoy the CJB .......It opens up the Scripture in a whole new light. Jesus our Lord was Hebrew, and to understand Scripture from the Hebraic view, is very amazing, and incredible. CJB is Complete Jewish Bible

[truthfulreply]

I'll take the original one -My Catholic Bible

The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th ed. | 2008 | COPYRIGHT 1993 The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia Copyright © 2002,

Vulgate [Lat. Vulgata editio =common edition], most ancient extant version of the whole Christian Bible . Its name derives from a 13th-century reference to it as the "editio vulgata." The official Latin version of the Roman Catholic Church, it was prepared c.AD 383-AD 405 by St. Jerome (c.342-420) at the request of Pope St. Damasus I

[micmoable]

King James bible is only worthy version of God's Word---all those modernized and watered-down versions can lead folks astray

[xsandsnowx]

Amen, Brother. Very well and humbly said.

[mwilson70201]

Good video brother. I could never understand why so many who profess faith in Christ can't pass up an opportunity to attack the word of their salvation. It's beyond comprehension that "christians" deny God preserved a perfect bible. They have more faith in scholarship then they do in scripture. How can this be? Textual critics comprise the protestant version of the Catholic magisterium, the group of cardinals that determine what is and isn't God's truth. They are modern Scribes and Pharisees.

[gillamrl]

@YTubeCheese You are greatly mistaken.. sad

[Wyowanderer777]

Excellent, thank you kindly!

[becomingbatmitzvah]

@TheKJVberean I don't know which "God" "anointed" the KJV. The KJV does not even claim that. It's only a translation. I don't which "God" you claim anointed the KJV, because the God I believe created the heavens and the earth and was around a lot longer than the KJV. What was the "anointed" version before the KJV came around? Did God thunder it down from Mt. Sinai?

[becomingbatmitzvah]

One place I find that the KJV surpasses all is Romans 8:1 "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." Most versions leave that out.

[YTubeCheese]

The fellow in this video is very mistaken. Here are just a few examples: (1) the KJV isn't based on a majority text. While the TR follows a Byzantine majority reading most of the time, it has some readings that are way outside the mainstream. (2) The translators of the KJV admitted in their preface that their work wasn't perfect; that only the autographs were perfect. (3) God has blessed many translations with very widespread, traditional acceptance in the church's history, e.g. Vulgate and NIV.