"The Most Terrifying Video You'll Ever See" has over 7,200,000 views, but this sequel makes the better argument.
And now even this 7-hour series has been trumped by the book: "What's the Worst Th...
"The Most Terrifying Video You'll Ever See" has over 7,200,000 views, but this sequel makes the better argument.
And now even this 7-hour series has been trumped by the book: "What's the Worst That Could Happen? A Rational Response to the Climate Change Debate." Available from Amazon and others through the links at www.gregcraven.org.
Author Bill McKibben said "This book trumps most of our accounts of the global warming crisis," the former Commander-in-Chief of U.S. CENTCOM Gen. Anthony Zinni called it "innovative and intelligent.... superbly crafted.... A must read," and the New Scientist said "If Craven could get everybody who has weighed in on this debate to go through the exercises in the book, Al Gore should share his Nobel peace prize."
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
@recencyeffect Ever hear of Obama's green jobs czar. Just because many people don't call it communism by name doesn't mean the principles they are proposing are not communistic.
Tell me how tax is going to realistically mitigate global warming? Cap and trade isn't going to realistically stop CO2 around the world.
There are actual things we can do which have been proposed by scientists if warming were to be a real catastrophe. ppl need to separate worst case scenario from likely scenario.
@DDUFubar lol I don't know how you think it being warm outside your house is the climate (thats the weather). Over where I am it has been the coldest December in decades... yet I don't think we are going to an ice age.
If there were real empirical evidence for a catastrophe then lets take the risk... but we risked banning DDT and millions of people are dieing each year in Africa. How many more need to die in Africa over stopping ONLY risk.
How bout we LEARN that EVERYTHING governments say is a LIE and realize that everything they are behind is designed for an alternate agenda, in this case a world tax, world government and eugenics.
Climate threat NOT CERTAIN so we have to do something? Taxing all activities will do absolutely nothing but make the bankers even more rich and powerful.
Debates are the best invention to distract from what is really going on.
@sputnik323 Who is calling for communism? The regulation of something does not automatically lead to communism, I don't know how you take this weird step. It's like me saying that losing some sort of regulation leads to anarchism. And please do tell how you can realistically mitigate global warming without any government action (regulation).
I don`t know about you, but over here it`s 17 degrees centigrade, I`v never felt this warm in Christmas time before no cloud in the sky, just sun and a cool breeze,you would hate mankind if you took the risk.
The sky is falling! The SKY is FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING! everyone run! Hide now!
Its like every AGW fanatic was never read to as a child (chicken little) so they have to make it up by predicting man's doom because they hate mankind so much they want it to be true.
@DDUFubar There is real risk of human destruction every day since the world built enough nuclear weapons. The risk according to the IPCC's own figures for catastrophe is low. Why do fanatics always state catastrophe as inevitable? we know the globe is warming. we know CO2 is a GHG. but data doesn't support CO2 to cause catastrophic warming and the end of mankind!! why are fanatics so gloom and doom?
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Some of it is NOT subtitlet. Live with it..
This is no "lala" theory..
Ever hear of Obama's green jobs czar. Just because many people don't call it communism by name doesn't mean the principles they are proposing are not communistic.
Tell me how tax is going to realistically mitigate global warming? Cap and trade isn't going to realistically stop CO2 around the world.
There are actual things we can do which have been proposed by scientists if warming were to be a real catastrophe. ppl need to separate worst case scenario from likely scenario.
lol I don't know how you think it being warm outside your house is the climate (thats the weather). Over where I am it has been the coldest December in decades... yet I don't think we are going to an ice age.
If there were real empirical evidence for a catastrophe then lets take the risk... but we risked banning DDT and millions of people are dieing each year in Africa. How many more need to die in Africa over stopping ONLY risk.
Climate threat NOT CERTAIN so we have to do something?
Taxing all activities will do absolutely nothing but make the bankers even more rich and powerful.
Debates are the best invention to distract from what is really going on.
Who is calling for communism? The regulation of something does not automatically lead to communism, I don't know how you take this weird step. It's like me saying that losing some sort of regulation leads to anarchism. And please do tell how you can realistically mitigate global warming without any government action (regulation).
Its like every AGW fanatic was never read to as a child (chicken little) so they have to make it up by predicting man's doom because they hate mankind so much they want it to be true.
There is real risk of human destruction every day since the world built enough nuclear weapons. The risk according to the IPCC's own figures for catastrophe is low. Why do fanatics always state catastrophe as inevitable? we know the globe is warming. we know CO2 is a GHG. but data doesn't support CO2 to cause catastrophic warming and the end of mankind!! why are fanatics so gloom and doom?