NYC Marathon - Top Gadgets of 2007
Loading...
Loading...
55,851
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 4:40Garmin Forerunner 305by TigerDirectBlog42,748 views
- 0:52Détails Garmin Forerunner 310 XTby Nutricycles11,804 views
- 6:03Garmin forerunner 305 reviewby imallmac21,762 views
- 0:39Garmin Forerunner 205 Gps watchby yudiardiansyah821,894 views
- 3:41Garmin Forerunner 305 Testberichtby kronenmichl36,492 views
- 2:13Garmin Forerunner Range Comparison & Review (fe...by LovingOutdoorsTeam25,623 views
- 1:57Garmin Forerunner 305 GPS Receiver With Heart R...by Forerunner305GPS11,720 views
- 1:40136 Days In 12 Seconds - Body Transformation Ti...by AdamWatersRTP4,237,037 views
- 2:26Garmin Forerunner 405CX Reviewby Globetechnology87,273 views
- 1:13Garmin Forerunner 305 Watch | Full Feature of G...by celinewayne14,088 views
- 2:57Bombshell Butt Workoutby charliejames19755,744,960 views
- 1:31Slopeside Interview: Garmin Forerunner 305by skistrong7,604 views
- 5:08Garmin Forerunner 305 - Software Reviewby Beastt1715,091 views
- 1:16Garmin Forerunner Multisportby DarWinEvolution5,098 views
- 3:39FR60 - Footpodby garminblog23,352 views
- 1:04Decathlon - CW Kalenji 300 playby ProductosDecathlon7,882 views
- 5:09YEAR END: Best Gadgets of 2007by computerworld8,768 views
- 2:58Polar ProTrainer 5by PolarUSA39,192 views
- 8:34Suunto Observer & Polar RS400by watchvids0237,155 views
Sorry but no serious runner is running with music
wickedvalues 9 months ago
l love my garmin dont go out for a run without it
far2slow1 1 year ago
Even this crap has been out sourced. What a dumbass, how can you compare the Garmin GPS to a simple HR monitor. One of the worst comparison's I've seen.
Even comparing the Garmin to the Nano is crap, since you have to calibrate the nano and it's not as accurate.
jamesgang94591 1 year ago 2
fuck can't you engage a modetator that actually can speak a normal english?
her noise is terribly anoying
TheVerySpecialThommy 1 year ago 2
shes got great pronunciation
kiwy85 2 years ago
I have armin and GPS has NEVER failed in any weather, it's easily the best and you don't need a lame footpod!!!!!!!
wiseguy280 2 years ago
Question for experts: If I were to run a large circle loop using the Garmin 305 to navigate, at what point in the circle would the trackback feature tell me that going forward to the finish would be the best direction to get there rather than turning around and retracing my steps? I just had this happen. The reverse told me 9 miles, but I knew the start wasn't that far forward in the loop.
robertmartinez 3 years ago
polar has a gps also and i dont think you have seen many polar running watches if you think that they dont have that many features.. I dont work for the company i just had many polars and like 2 garmins and i tought they were horrible..
MostValuablePlaya 3 years ago
in other words, you work for polar / you only had the polar watch.
because if you wouldn't be, you would know that 1) the foot pod is not accurate. 2) gps works fine in almost all conditions. 3)Garmin has the option to use a foot pod and 4) it has more functions than the polar. 5) cheaper+better = winner.
only thing polar beats garmin is looks, but I can live with that.
igurman 3 years ago 2
Garmin and Suunto are shit.. Suunto is just bad, Garmin only has GPS to calculate the distance and we all know how GPS work in bad weather... Polar has the footpod which gives you the speed, distance and candence rain or shine.. Nothing compares to polar in the heartrate monitor watches, they are just above all the competition.
MostValuablePlaya 3 years ago