Dubai 07 QF hawkeye dispute Nadal

Dubai 07 QF hawkeye dispute Nadal

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Dubai
• 07
• QF
• hawkeye
• dispute
• Nadal
• action
• american
• football
• baseball
• basketball
• combat
• sports
• extreme
• track
• field
• tennis
• talk
• soccer
• motor
• sport
• martial
• arts
• hockey
• golf
• water
• winter

[SniperKingA13]

Yup, I mean Nadal only has 10 grand slams, has reached #1 in the world, won sportsman of the year more than once, for sure he's a bad loser. DAMN you people are stupid, it's ok to get pissed once or twice, calm the hell down.

[TheMega0023]

You vs Nadal

[cheaterNadal]

too annoying player always. gamesmanship. looks down on sampras and past players. selfish. two-year-ranking. sucks nadal

[ioakeim98]

The best Hawkeye Challenge i ever seen!!!

[butterflycaught900]

hmm the camera just happens to cut away from nadal when he throws his racket down? perhaps a biased tv director who knows nadal likes to point out that he never throws rackets out of respect, and wanted to protect his image?

[IAMLS360]

@kelman221 thought u might say that for some reason. A childish response. I obviously cannot win and neither can you, especially as u found the need to revive a very much dead arguement. The problem is, you revived a different one

[kelman221]

@IAMLS360 Lol you can't win an arguement so you say 'see ya', ok, good bye buddy.

[IAMLS360]

@kelman221 no u fail to understand the expression - U have ignored my arguement and begun to make your own assertions as to what u think I'm saying and making what u think absolute - putting words in my mouth. Critical Thinking? U r the one not responding to the original arguement here and have done nothing but cherry pick my words. I don't know the man, it is a standpoint I take based on evidence i see. You are in the same position, it just seems you cant get over it. I have. See ya

[kelman221]

@IAMLS360 By being contrary I torwards you I was able to influence your response, which is more of a words in your keyboard :P. You mention the media because all you do is look up just a few examples (without thinking about the circumstance) on the internet and use that as your arguement instead of doing some critical thinking, which in turn makes you a tool. And Nadal is a very gracious loser MOST of the time. If he is a bad loser than I guess everyone in tennis is (or sports that matter).

[IAMLS360]

@kelman221 I am saying what I mean and it seems that you just cannot accept my opinion. I did say I question his on court character, but you said that I think all top players are bad. When did I say that? You said I mention the media in my arguement, where? Btw, I'm not a tool, I'm arguing for me, no one else. Never said that getting angry is bad, original arguement was Nadal is a bad loser. No one has convinced me otherwise. Please tell me how you put words in my mouth?

[kelman221]

@IAMLS360 It already did work and youre trying to beat around it, oh well. Also you said it was his character in question. If you do not want words put in your mouth, actually say what youre meaning, ignorant. And of course on court people are going to show emotions you tool, and sometimes they are even warranted. So what if people get angry sometimes or do things that other people may not agree with, its part of competitive sports.

[IAMLS360]

@kelman221 and once again we have someone completely ignoring what I commented. I have watched tennis for over 10 years and have watched hundreds of matches involving the top players, I think I can formulate my own opinion on players thanks. It pisses me off when someone as ignorant as yourself never listens. When did i mention the media? When did i say players are bad people? On court character is what I question, not their personal character. Your puttin words in my mouth buddy. It won't work