Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Dear Michelle Bachmann...

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,643
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 2, 2011

I hope you can live with yourself. Because I wouldn't be able to.

The video in question
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RenwNhL1Te0&feature=player_embedded

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (LatumWay)

  • I am not trying to offend your interests in US culture, but why do you care what Michelle Bachmann has to say? You are from GB right?

    I would honestly not care what a GB politician as to say. I am not meaning to offend I just don't see the point of it all. Maybe it is because I am self centered in my own world. But if the US elected an asshole president I wouldn't care if I was from GB.

  • @MacHead31 I was about to write out a long, drawn-out, lengthy response to this question... but I'm sorry. I simply have no time for people who question my interest in the rights of others simply because I am not under the same jurisdiction as them.

  • @MrHelldogger Are you talking about sexual intercourse or 'sex' as in 'male/female'?

Top Comments

see all

All Comments (335)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @arsenalskate123 Then you're clearly unfamiliar with the founding principles of your country as well as its laws. In the US the government officially recognizes marriage, and the US government is entirely secular. It does not recognize that the concept of marriage is a religious-specific institution.

    You might have an argument if you were discussing a country with a church officially recognized by the government, such as England. It doesn't apply to the US.

  • @TheMors666

    you totally took my shit out of context.. where marrige comes form doesn't matter. in u.s.a, it is religious. and you know that. keep the government out of it and religious people can say it's only between man and a woman. i'm not talking about the world; just u.s.a

  • @MrHelldogger And you learned all this in only 15 minutes of sex study? That's spectacular. There are dumb ass biologists and psychologists who spend decades studying all of this stuff! The idiots!

    All these guys say the latest evidences is that homosexuality is genetic, but you've got all of the facts, figures and studies to prove them wrong and it only took you 15 minutes!

    Dude, you seriously need to tackle curing cancer next. Seriously, people are dying and you have a gift.

  • @MrHelldogger Wow! You figured out all this science stuff when you were a teenager; amazing!

    All this time I thought that not liking smelly people had something to do with genes, but you're saying it's mental and learned behaviour? So if someone had been raised away from bad smells, or was unable to smell until having a medical procedure until adulthood, they wouldn't know that a person shitting their pants was a bad thing when they smell it for the first time? Incredible!

  • @TheMors666 Well Einstien, I got my information when I was in high school & that was before they became communist/anti-Christ indocrination centers geared toward creating New World Order slaves. It takes about a 15 min study into sex ed to know sex is mental, not physical. Just try becoming aroused by a fat ugly hairy person with B.O. It takes a 2 min. study to find out hair & eye color are passed on{genetically}, MoMo.

  • @MrHelldogger If something's genetic it's in the genes? You should write a paper because you know so much science! You should include the following stuff:

    - Where you got the 80% mental/20% physical # (include the study so people don't think you pulled a number out your ass)

    - The % chance a recessive "homo" gene would be present generationally

    - Your psychological study indicating homosexuality causes harm

    - Your psychological study showing this is why offspring are straight

  • @TheMors666 I know, you're being silly. Well I'm not. If homosexuality were genetical it would be carried in the genes. Get it?!?!?!? In other words others in the same family would be homos, which is rarely the case since the kids of homos usually see the harm & go the other way, normal. BTW what's it like being wash brained? Nevermind, it's not important.

  • @arsenalskate123 So now you don't care where religion came from, it's just that religion basically owns it? That's your argument that marriage is a religious institution; religion "kinda" owns it now?

    Religion and marriage are two separate things. Even if most religions have their own versions of a marriage ceremony, none of them are seen as the "right" one. Under your definition, someone could create a new religion (about anything) today and it would be a valid marriage.

  • @TheMors666

    i don't think anyone cares where marriage came from. marriage is basically owed by religion today. i will never get married but because of the benifits the government gives to married couples, i probably will. if the government just kept out of religion (religion is private. like a private country club) we wouldn't have these debates about gay marriage. from one topic to another, if government would tax every church just like they do to any business, U.S.A wouldn't be in this debt

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more