Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

USB vs Firewire Speeds

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,893
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 18, 2009

Us Mac users must be in a hurry...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (sdschramm)

  • I've moved files (the same ones, from the same drive, to the same computer) using USB 2.0, FireWire 800, FireWire 400 and eSATA. eSATA is the winner, with around 100mb/s, FireWire runs at around 80mb/s for me. 400 around 50mb/s and USB 2.0 around 30mb/s. I find USB is much slower when moving a lot of smaller files than FW or eSATA is, but it's not THAT bad for big files. It drops to around 10mb/s with a bunch of small files. FW and eSATA don't seem to drop all that much. At least in my testing.

  • @TalesOfWar  That sounds about right!

  • The transfer rates between firewire and 2.0 are basically identical.

  • @RCTPatriot75 But their throughput and efficiency aren't.

  • well firewire is better if you ask me but c'mon thei difference it is not like one 6 secs and the other 6 min,except if you used usb1 not 2.It is a fact though firewire is faster than usb

  • @w1o5w6 USB 1.1

Top Comments

  • this test is wrong in so many ways! in order to be correct, you have to use ONE SINGLE hard drive that has both usb and firewire... and use it with ONE SIGNLE computer only! and test only for copying FROM or TO a hard drive (READ and WRITE speed are different in almost everything).

    "This was just a test for fun, not an official benchmark"

    sorry but you cant really misinform people with wrong results then calling it "for fun". if it is for fun, keep it to yourself! thanks

  • firewire is the best, fuck stupid usb

see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RCTPatriot75 they're really not. not in a real-world scenario. Every benchmark I've run on mine and my family's computers all place FireWire 400 above USB 2.0 in sequential & random reads and writes.

  • Great Presentation

  • Such a biased comparison lol. Read/Write are completely different, SSD/HDD are completely different. USB/Firewire are very similar in speed.

    I regularly read-copy at 30 MB/s with USB2.0 with a cheap external 500gb HDD. 6 minutes for 200mb is absurd. As a matter of fact I just read-copied my 20.7gb World of Warcraft folder in 9 minutes.

  • Yeah the difference is huge. USB 2 takes for even when load in 10GB+ onto my ext drive, And I'm still using FW400 and it does everything so much better.

  • The problem is the memory chip performance, may be..

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more