IWC60:Result of Japanese Scientific Whaling + IWC Denmark Voting

1,The result of Scientific Whaling.
2,IWC Denmark(Greenland) voting result.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Whaling
• IWC
• Japan
• Scientific
• Denmark
• Greenland
• Supecial
• Permit

[velvetinebunny]

I didn't see them checking any of the whales age, sex organs or stomache contents.

They hunt the whales in the Antartic because it's a whale sanctuary where the whales are to be protected not hunted!!

[yugopixy]

Q, Do you favor that AUZ, NZ, EU refused the Danish(Greenland) quota proposal at the recent IWC 61th assembly?

The Greenland's request, 10 humpback a year, had been certified as "NO" harm to the population of humpback off west Greenland by IWC's scientific Committee.

[seseljsrs]

Defenders of eco-terrorism have a political bedfellow in the government of Australia, which explains why they are now willing to avoid criticism of Australia's historical and current environmental record. Oz's declaration of her territorial waters extending to the Antarctic, is not a form of redressing this reality at all, and one wonders what kind of fanaticism could inspire such delusion.

[seseljsrs]

Even more panels of international law would agree Shepherd-PETA's terrorism is not just cruel, but criminal.

As for likening Japan to a petulant child, rather than a global power, that is a big part of the problem.

[Logicbeatslies]

There are not billions of Humpbacks.

When there are - get back to me.

[yugopixy]

@Logicbeatslies

lol It's a familiar response, turning its eye blind to an inconvenient fact and evading the question.

You would never agree to hunt humpback whatever IWC's scientific Committee says, the seven seas are filled with billions of Humpbacks since whale is not a marine resource to be managed, hunt, eaten in your mind.

Be honesty!

[Logicbeatslies]

How you start being realistic and stop asking stupid questions.

[yugopixy]

@Logicbeatslies

Q1, Are you opposed to the recommendation of  IWC's scientific Committee? It says the Greenland's coastal humpback is increasing and would never be affected by 10 hunting quota a year.

Q2, I'm afraid about Auz would against hunting Humpbacks joyfully even if your water is occupied with billions of Humpbacks and being unable to sail out to sea. right?

[Logicbeatslies]

Yes, of course I am against hunting Humpbacks.

It isn't just about 10 whales as you should well realise. It is about opening the flood gates to commercial whaling for ANY country and humpbacks are just hundreds away from being back on the endangered list.

This is irresponsible marine management to the extreme.

[yugopixy]

@Logicbeatslies

Q1, Do you favor that AUZ voted down the Danish(Greenland) proposal, its quota(10 humpback a year) had been verified as "NO" influence on humpback specie by IWC's scientific Committee, at the IWC 60th assembly?

Q2, After all, Would you require a ban on any whaling on the earth whether or not its population is increasing and abundant for hunting, as one of marine resources, under the scientific-managed quota system?

[Logicbeatslies]

What is the point of this video?

Lethal research didn't help provide any of the spurious findings and the extremely low amount of scientific reports are of a laughably low quality - Japan is not whaling to collect research - it is collecting food.

[deadfishfloating]

It is all going to be rather funny when one of these Japanese whale poaching fleets gets sunk.

oh teh drama!!!1

Seriously though, Japan is provoking Australia for no good reason. Instead japan should be courting Australia. Its called diplomacy and as it stands Japan is pushing Australia into Chinas' arms.

Worst foreign policy ever but then thats what happens when you let fisheries agency run your whole country!