@Yvesyew go figure yur self monkey. It was Chinaman who came up with idea that hanzi was invented by ancient Korean. according to Chinese scholars nothing was invented by chinese aka hua people. Hua is true Chinese. don't try to take other non chinese related into ancient Chinese. ancient Chinese =/= modern chinese
@consoleman09 oh yeah, whose that chinese scholar then? gimme a name, or else u r just a LIAR. u should PROVE IT, who when where did he say that. Don't ever tell me "GOOGLE IT URSELF" again, because it sounds so lame, and it shows that u r actually not sure about it too. :)
tell u what, even if it comes frm a chinese, it is still a LIE.
if korean invented Hanzi then u korean wouldn't have to invent the Hanguel.
@consoleman09 oh yeah, whose that chinese scholar then? gimme a name, or else u r just a LIAR. u should PROVE IT, who when where did he say that. Don't ever tell me "GOOGLE IT URSELF" again, because it sounds so lame, and it shows that u r actually not sure about it too. :)
tell u what, even if it comes frm a chinese, it is still a LIE.
if korean invented Hanzi then u korean wouldn't have to invent the Hanguel.
@consoleman09 and also, instead of me searching the lies and imaginated history u korean r so fanscinated bout, why not u urself go to ur national muzuem for a trip?
The金 in aisin gioro family does not mean he is a korean, there are millions of Chinese over the globe, r having the name of Kim as well, and the name 金 is too ordinary for both 女真 nu zhen (ancestor of Manchurian) and chinese, but this doesn't mean their ancestor are all from KIM Family of Korea. so ur point doesn't count.
@consoleman09 lol,chinese scholars who says it, chinese written history, blah blah blah....all the bullshits u giving are baseless and u have no proof for it. It was what Korean said chinese history are full of fabricated lies & stories, and since when u korean are so sure about those CHINESE SCHOLARS said? (btw, show me the exact detailed info of those SCHOLARS and Your so called Chinese written history, it is too easy to say JUST GOOGLE IT.unless u don't have any supporting fact.
@Yvesyew Read Chinese written history, and go find yourself, it's all in the Google. Mongke Khan of Yuan was half Korean btw via his mother's side. Aisin Gioro descendants still uses "Kim" as last name it's written as Jin in Chinese. Actually, many Chinese surnames were not originated by Chinese. The notion of Chinese is actually very modern title. If you go back just few hundred years, there was Kitan, Jurchen, manchu, Korean & Mongol at North and Chinese at south.
@Yvesyew hanzi goes back to beyond chinese in making so your argument have zero credibility. It wasn't Koreans claimed it first, it was Chinese scholars who says it was invention of ancient Korean, lol then blamed it onto Korean. Get a life loser
@consoleman09 just what kind of your so called "Chinese history reference" that says Nurhachi is a korean? prove it then, don't bark like dog without any existed fact to back you up.
Nurhaci is the descendent of Mongke Mongol, a mix of Mongolian and Manchurian, and also, his family name is Aisin Gioro, not some Fucking retarded Kim, get your mind right, Han Gook Jin.
anyway, the surname KIM, and MOST others korean surname, were ORIGINATED and GIVEN BY the CHINESE.
@consoleman09 Gook does not apply to all East asian, it is either refer to Philipino or Korean. but it is more likely korean, first of all it sounds Korean." Me gook me gook" , thats how korean speak "america" in their broken english, and thats what made the american calling the korean Gook.
@Yvesyew go figure yur self monkey. It was Chinaman who came up with idea that hanzi was invented by ancient Korean. according to Chinese scholars nothing was invented by chinese aka hua people. Hua is true Chinese. don't try to take other non chinese related into ancient Chinese. ancient Chinese =/= modern chinese
consoleman09 1 year ago
@consoleman09 oh yeah, whose that chinese scholar then? gimme a name, or else u r just a LIAR. u should PROVE IT, who when where did he say that. Don't ever tell me "GOOGLE IT URSELF" again, because it sounds so lame, and it shows that u r actually not sure about it too. :)
tell u what, even if it comes frm a chinese, it is still a LIE.
if korean invented Hanzi then u korean wouldn't have to invent the Hanguel.
it's just a logic thinking. u Liar
Yvesyew 1 year ago
@consoleman09 oh yeah, whose that chinese scholar then? gimme a name, or else u r just a LIAR. u should PROVE IT, who when where did he say that. Don't ever tell me "GOOGLE IT URSELF" again, because it sounds so lame, and it shows that u r actually not sure about it too. :)
tell u what, even if it comes frm a chinese, it is still a LIE.
if korean invented Hanzi then u korean wouldn't have to invent the Hanguel.
it's just a logic thinking. u Liar
Yvesyew 1 year ago
@consoleman09 and also, instead of me searching the lies and imaginated history u korean r so fanscinated bout, why not u urself go to ur national muzuem for a trip?
The金 in aisin gioro family does not mean he is a korean, there are millions of Chinese over the globe, r having the name of Kim as well, and the name 金 is too ordinary for both 女真 nu zhen (ancestor of Manchurian) and chinese, but this doesn't mean their ancestor are all from KIM Family of Korea. so ur point doesn't count.
Yvesyew 1 year ago
@consoleman09 lol,chinese scholars who says it, chinese written history, blah blah blah....all the bullshits u giving are baseless and u have no proof for it. It was what Korean said chinese history are full of fabricated lies & stories, and since when u korean are so sure about those CHINESE SCHOLARS said? (btw, show me the exact detailed info of those SCHOLARS and Your so called Chinese written history, it is too easy to say JUST GOOGLE IT.unless u don't have any supporting fact.
Yvesyew 1 year ago
@Yvesyew Read Chinese written history, and go find yourself, it's all in the Google. Mongke Khan of Yuan was half Korean btw via his mother's side. Aisin Gioro descendants still uses "Kim" as last name it's written as Jin in Chinese. Actually, many Chinese surnames were not originated by Chinese. The notion of Chinese is actually very modern title. If you go back just few hundred years, there was Kitan, Jurchen, manchu, Korean & Mongol at North and Chinese at south.
consoleman09 1 year ago
@Yvesyew hanzi goes back to beyond chinese in making so your argument have zero credibility. It wasn't Koreans claimed it first, it was Chinese scholars who says it was invention of ancient Korean, lol then blamed it onto Korean. Get a life loser
consoleman09 1 year ago
@consoleman09 just what kind of your so called "Chinese history reference" that says Nurhachi is a korean? prove it then, don't bark like dog without any existed fact to back you up.
Nurhaci is the descendent of Mongke Mongol, a mix of Mongolian and Manchurian, and also, his family name is Aisin Gioro, not some Fucking retarded Kim, get your mind right, Han Gook Jin.
anyway, the surname KIM, and MOST others korean surname, were ORIGINATED and GIVEN BY the CHINESE.
Yvesyew 1 year ago
@consoleman09 Gook does not apply to all East asian, it is either refer to Philipino or Korean. but it is more likely korean, first of all it sounds Korean." Me gook me gook" , thats how korean speak "america" in their broken english, and thats what made the american calling the korean Gook.
Yvesyew 1 year ago
@consoleman09 yeah, u can only myong dung dung
Yvesyew 1 year ago