Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

In Defense of WWII: Part 4 of 5

Niall Ferguson, author of The War of the World, describes the Allies in WWII as just as brutal as the German and Japanese opposition. In rebuttal, Hitchens makes the point that Germany and Japan we...  
 
Customize

More From: AngrySkeptic

Loading...

QuickList(0)

This is a video response to In Defense of WWII: Part 3 of 5
27 ratings
Sign in to rate
5,710 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (28)   Options

Loading...
andi332 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yeah, long term is 50 years of comunist tyranny of east europe, and much more millions killed
TBlake34 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I will add one detail to the discussion of why America and the allies were better than the axis powers:

The town that my father grew up in housed a German POW camp. They were treated with respect and decency and regularly held Christmas pagents and other celebratory events.

Allies were treated a little differently when captured.

This is one of the reasons, by the way, why the GITMO issue is so important. We are Americans, we're better than detention and torture.
smoochym (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Death rates of POWs held by Axis powers
Chinese POWs held by Japan: > 99%[citation needed] (only 56 survivors at the end of the war)[66]
U.S. and British Commonwealth POWs held by Germany: ~4% [65]
Soviet POWs held by Germany: 57.5% [67]
Western Allied POWs held by Japan: 27% [68]
smoochym (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
German POWs in East European (not including the Soviet Union) hands 32.9%[67]
German soldiers held by Soviet Union: 15-33%[67])
Japanese POWs held by Soviet Union: 10%
German POWs in British hands 0.03%[67]
German POWs in American hands 0.15%[67]
German POWs in French hands 2.58%[67]
Japanese POWs held by U.S.: relatively low, mainly suicides according to James D. Morrow[69] or according to Ulrich Straus high as many prisoners were shot by front line troops.[45]
DrCruel (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
In WW II, we also had laws on how spies and saboteurs were to be treated. By those rules, they should have been interrogated, evaluated for their value to the war effort, and used so long as they were valuable - after which they would be summarily executed.

See the Supreme Court case, "Ex parte Richard Quirin", 317 U.S. 1 (1942).
tonylee1973 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I think the US (and in particular myself) are better than other countries. Thats why we should not have entered WW2. Let the parasites kill each other. Then trade with who ever wins.
Sanderniet (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
well, then you lose the one thing that would make you better.
sennis12 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
As much as I admire and respect these two historians, I must admit that they should not critique Ferguson with out understanding the thesis, as I have read the book and the purpose of the War of the World is to understand why the 20th century was so violent. He says its because of ethnic disintegration, economic volatility, and empires-in-decline. Also he states that World Wars 1&2+the Cold War, saw the descent of the west and the ascendency of China and the east.
TomPiltoff (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Peter Robinson is such a worm, he just had to throw in that his grandfather fought in World War II as if it gives him any added insight. I love that Hansen one-ups him with the 'my namesake was killed there.'
Moredread25 (8 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Somebody should put Furgeson and Hitchens together and see what happens - there appears to be no video of it up on youtube.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.