Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Making Oil in Less than 30 Minutes

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,794
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 21, 2007

Evolutionists hypothesize that oil was formed millions of years ago. If this was true, the pressure would have dissipated through the cracked and porous overlying rock layers. The oil has only been in the ground for about 4400 years. Most of the oil taken out so far is from shallow wells. The biggest reserves are much deeper, and replenish the oil that is pumped out in areas such as the Gulf of Mexico and the North Slope of Alaska.
s8int.com/boneyard4.html See also pages 1, 3, and 5.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 16 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mrmacmasonry)

  • Oh no!! - we are burning the remains of that poor people and animals that died in noahs flood to create a new flood by global warming!

    Hmm - but that must have been a lot of critters. Lets see, global animal biomass is estimated at 600 million tons, 200 tons ideally make 600 barrels of oil, that is 1.8 billion barrels of oil, at the current rate of consumption of 85 million barrels daily that would last an astonishing 21 days... duh!

  • @auroraglacialis

    Your ignorance is dazzling, sport. So... you think everything has always been as it is now, and only 10% of the Earth's land surface has ever supported lush vegetation and animal life? Wow. Get a clue.

  • @auroraglacialis

    Re: "You cannot count vegetation for oil production as vegetation is transformed to coal by burial. If you do count vegetation, you need to find a new explanation for coal formation."

    Dead wrong, sport. Coal is formed from floating mats of logs. Vegetation also makes oil under global flood conditions. So oil comes from both animal and vegetable materials.

    "Even if your claim that I missed 90% of the biomass (why?), this would just increase the amount 10-fold"

    Wrong again.

  • theageofbasemetalDOTblogspotDO­Tcom

    That should open some eyes.

  • Your 50,000 year figure is overly optimistic, to anyone who has learned to think rather than believing the NWO brainwash. Taking into account the earth's deteriorating magnetic field and the fact that C14 has not yet reached equilibrium (it is still increasing, and takes about 10,000 years to reach equilibrium), the margin for error in radiocarbon dating is about 1000%. The old civilizations have been wrongly dated due to the false assumption that they were consecutive rather than concurrent.

  • If you post obscene, false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing or irrelevant comments, your comments will be deleted. If you persist, you will be blocked. Do you have anything intelligent or of a specific scientific nature to contribute?

    You're on thin ice, bud.

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @xESOTERlC yeah I know that. But that would have required too much "belief" in science which tells us about where oil came from - something obviously not so favoured by the people inventing this theory. So I stuck to rather common and easy to understand data and numbers that do not take a geochemist to understand

  • @auroraglacialis Oil came from sea life, including its vegetation. Coal is from land vegetation.

    Other than that

    :)

  • @mrmacmasonry

    The numbers I gave are total Earth animal biomass, including the oceans (which is a bonus, as obviously fish would not die in a flood). You cannot count vegetation for oil production as vegetation is transformed to coal by burial. If you do count vegetation, you need to find a new explanation for coal formation.

    Even if your claim that I missed 90% of the biomass (why?), this would just increase the amount 10-fold, leading to 210 days - still not even a year!

  • this is they first creationist channel that does not ban comments to videos. for that you must be commended.

    as for kent hovind everyone knows he just talks crap to make money off the ignorant and gullible.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more