hydrogen heater low cost

http://www.weedseeds.ie

hydrogen heater

Category:

Education

Tags:

• water heater hho
• hydrogen heater
• free energy

[jjenson2006]

But they don't mention the electricity that is used to produce it. I would say that you would be better off using the electricity directly, rather than convert it to HHO first.

[MrWeedluv]

hi there , think they said it takes 300 watts of power ,,

[merlinspower]

@desertphile You spoke ? I didn't give you permission. Everyone , please excuse this IDIOT, for speaking he is less than a Nothing hermit that left hisself out in the sun too long. He has dementia

Futhermore, on the subject of using oxy-hydrogen for heating , you are a Oxy-moron

You are not  worthy

[jjenson2006]

Well yes, this is true,...but the heat generated is dissipated in the conversion process; it is not all emitted as usable heat

...but at least we agree that it is pointless to first convert to HHO; which also requires maintainence such as refilling with water and cleaning.

It really has no practical use as a heater.

[merlinspower]

1.) The temperature of the tip of the flame is 2800 degrees to 5000F

2) TRY to find any electrical devise to compare it to that uses 300watts. Puts out that kind of consentrated heat. 3) Heat is why oxy-hydrogen gas is the SMART way to heat your home. It does the job

[merlinspower]

@a1mint You are in error. If you don't correct it then its your mistake. 1) very Little electricity is used in the process of electrolysis.

2)even the heat in that process is utilised

3)The intent is to HEAT economically

4)There is NO loss, that you can measure. 5)A straight electric heater is not ( equal )unless it uses 300watts, Can you find one? your hair dryer uses more .

6) You know nothing about oxy-hydrogen.

[a1mint]

So, in the case of a heater, given that by definition, both a dirt cheap electric walmart heater and a finicky complicated HHO gadgetmathingy are 100% efficient in heating, there is absolutely no point whatsoever horsing around with HHO, other than for entertainment purposes.

It might be possible to show a pretty fire place like flame, I don't know.

But for efficiency sake, HHO is a 100% waste of effort - of course.

[a1mint]

That "loss" is actually heat. It can't be any other form of energy, because the laws of conservation of energy states that you can't create or consume energy - only convert it.

It's not being converted to motion or light. Heat is the only output, which includes heat from the "losses" which in this case isn't a loss. (on demand hho car systems incur heat losses too, which then ARE losses).

[jjenson2006]

If it were 100% efficient it would be, but science tells us you would lose SOME energy in the conversion.

...but lets say it was 100% efficient and delivered the same amount of heat like you claim; what would be the point of the conversion? What do you gain by doing this? Explain please.

[a1mint]

It would produce the exact same amount of heat.

[a1mint]

1) It's not powered by water, but it's powered by electricity.

2) Water is being split into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis.

3) The h and o are then put back together again by burning it.

4) The law of nature of the conservation of energy, states that you can not create or consume energy.

5) Energy is being converted, and eventually all is released as heat.

6) The losses in the conversion process is also heat.

7) A straight electric heater with same wattage will heat exactly equal.