Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

NORTH TOWER - Ch20

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,704
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2008

9/11 WTC1 bowing south columns

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 36 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (achimspok)

  • Achimspok, I cannot read the small red writing at the end. Can you or someone tell me what it says?

  • It says "maximum 55 inches".

  • seen all this befor, whats up with the music? what i you trying to make me feel?

    crap!

  • Turn off the sound! Put the soundtrack of Disneys "3 Caballeros" in the CD player! Watch it!

    Feels like a debunker video, right? It isn't.

    But I'm sure you've seen all the nice colors before. Next, try to understand the meaning!

  • what?

    ea name play! got it. wow! the music makes so much more sense, thanks. Dude, yes it was an inside job,.. im on youre side there. but you don't need this dark music to make it make sense. plus ive seen all this info before in a way better light. Why is it wrong for Fox to put out news with (call it want you want) mood altering music but not for us? makes us as bad as them. let the info speak for its self.

  • You are right but 4 hours video without any music is boring to make.

Top Comments

  • This video looks like a crude illustration of one aspect of the official analysis of the destruction by fire of the twin towers. But it is hard to recognize the silliness of this theory without reviewing it in details.

    Frankly, the twin towers' demolitions are much easier to illustrate.

    Love,

see all

All Comments (86)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Where is the scenario for controlled demolition?

    Search: watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

  • and the police cars and fire engines in New York are like match sticks, it only takes a spark to make them go up in flames and start to melt....

  • Don't argue with ignorants, idiots. They'll pull You to their level, then they defeat You by experience on this field.

  • Just one small detail...what about the resistance below, you know that other 45,000 tons of construction material ? W.T.C's 1, 2 & 7 were pre-wired and brought down under human control. Beyon a shadow of doubt and within the bounds of reality ! Wake up America..be heard !

  • one little problems with the 'pancake theory'... the walls never bowed inwards like you claim.... the beams bent OUTWARDS....you know like they would in an EXPLOSION.... LMAO you people are clowns for not believing what is right in front of your faces.... how many more scientists have to say nano-thermite was found in the dust all around the WTC complex for you all to believe BOMBS were involved

  • @TheCompleteGuitarist Everything on the list (a familiar rant) has a natural explanation. There is nothing on it that shouldn't be there simply as a natural consequence of the building's collapse, which was NOT SUDDEN

    U have to pretend it was in spite of obvious evidence on this video disproving this, just as U pretend that all the heat in the basement couldn't have originated from the tower's PE

    ae911truth hides it 2

    But since when has ANY controlled demolition EVER begun 20 minutes previously?

  • @TheCompleteGuitarist "no pancaked floors" i100. photobucket. com/albums/m18/JazzRoc/pancake­. jpg remove spaces "explosive ejections" Piston effect "dismemberment" A low-redundancy long-span building collapses like that "Several tons" Potential energy of tower equivalent to 481 tons of molten iron "thermite incendiaries/explosives" Friction microspherules and paint dust "not like fire" But like COLLAPSE "the path of greatest resistance" Was certainly not DOWNWARDS, then?
  • @TheCompleteGuitarist The LEAST RESISTANCE path of a LEANING and SLIDING tower top involved SLIDING DOWN the unbroken internal columns & being forced to recover an upright position as it fell "Improbable symmetry" See above "rapid onset" The collapse began very slowly 20 min before "reported explosions & flashes" Fires make these occasionally "sections ejected" That is the way buckling happens "pulverization" Is done by hammer blows. Were they a rarity? "pyroclastic" Yes. A lot of concrete dust.
  • 1200-foot-diameter debris field: no "pancaked" floors found

    Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front

    Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

    Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises

    Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples

    Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

    And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire

  • Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

    Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

    Extremely rapid onset of destruction

    Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

    Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally

    Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

    Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more