Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

In Defense of Keynes

If free market theories of Libertarians, Neo Classical & Austrian economists and Friedmanites had worked, there would have been no need for Lord John Maynard Keynes to publish his General Theory in...  
 
Customize

More From: radiohogan

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
57 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,767 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (172)   Options

Loading...
+3
Marked as spam
Too bad Al Gore didn't win.  I don't think he would have been interested with passing those tax cuts. Especially with 51 votes...
zsylvana (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Since Reagan era Supply-Side "trickle-down economics" mostly have dominated your goverments.J.K Galbraith noted that in had been tried before in the United States under the name "horse and sparrow theory" causin great damage.He wrote,"Supply-side economics was merely a cover for the old trickle-down approach to economic policy—what an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: If you feed the horse enough oats,some will pass through to the road for the sparrows."
+2
Marked as spam
@zsylvana

Yeah, I agree. I am in favor of government intervention, but the intervention has to be done right. Trickle-Down economics is not a form of intervention that works. It failed under Hoover, it failed under Reagan, under Bush the 1st, and under the most recent Bush.
+2
Marked as spam
Give me a break. Republicans or incompetent retards, stuck in the 1950's...
BMoIWU0711 (3 days ago)
Comment removed by author
+2
Marked as spam
@BMoIWU0711

Keep in mind that the Founders wrote the Constitution well before the Industrial Revolution got out of control. There was no such thing as monopolies back then.
BMoIWU0711 (3 days ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
agreed...however, in a free market economy there are no monopolies either...monopolies only exist in an economy in which governments place regulations.
+1
Marked as spam
@BMoIWU0711

Ugh, no that's not true at all.... Free markets are the driving factor behind monopolies. In unfettered Capitalism, the big fish will eat the little fish until there is one giant Walmart Monopoly that everyone HAS to shop at. Government Regulation is put in place to help slow or prevent that process. Those are laws against Conglomeration, Attrition Warfare, etc. Without those laws, the economy would be run even more by the powerful corporations, than it already is.
BMoIWU0711 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This is an interesting comment. Please enlighten everyone with details explaining your "inerrant" facts on this matter.
Whirlwind1500 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
Your description doesn't make sense... Free markets haven't been used since the 19-teens... so how could you say that if they were right there would have been no use for keynes, if they predicted that the Depression would happen when the government did what it did. How does keynes account for the 70's?? Its a direct contradiction to the predictions of keynes!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.