Noah's Ark, Amazing New Discovery, part 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,810
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 20, 2008

The Garden of Eden in Wisconsin? That's what Rev. Slyke declared in 1886, and it just happens to be the same location where I spotted one of the arc-shape features.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (moen333)

  • BTW, the Garden of Eden is stated to have been between KNOWN rivers, none of which are located in the U.S. Did someone pay you to discredit Christians, or what?

  • It's not like I was first...

    In 1869 Rev. D.O. Van Slyke, a Methodist preacher and Civil War veteran, believed that the Galesville area to be the biblical Garden of Eden. Van Slyke wrote a persuasive story placing Galesville at the absolute center of the biblical Garden of Eden. He attempted to prove his theory with evidence of the region's configuration of river's and lush agricultural production. You can still visit the statue south of the town square.

  • I must have missed something?... I don't get it, what does the arc's that you show are man-made have to do with Noah's ark? I am very interested in this subject...

  • Sorry for taking so long to respond... life gets busy. They only allow 500 characters here and that's not enough for a real response, so I added a posting to the blog they gave me at Amazon. To get to the blog, got to Amazon and search "Alan Moen"... then click on my book and my blog is part of the description. The "What does this mean" posting should answer your question.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Noah's Ark, Amazing New Discovery, part 1
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Genesis is fiction, allegory. From the 106 schools that make up the " Christian College Coalition" only 5 teach that Genesis has to be taken litterally and that the "global flood" really happened.

  • Amazing new fantasy. Period.

  • Bullshit to keep the gullible interested.

  • Where are the two rivers? Where are the Monutains of Ararat. Where are the great civcviolizations that bear the names we find in the Bible. This man theory is nosense.

  • giants what does that mean

  • Yah must be really busy then, 'cause there are Children with Cancer, dying from starvation and Aids.

    Should they pray more or what is your secret?

  • What are the chances that a baby boy and a baby girl will meet in their 20's or 30's and will marry each other ? Very slim, I'd say. And yet, so many families are formed that way. So the statistical argument seems empty.

    Besides, what is it with Americans trying to physicaly "belong" to the biblical story ?

  • The flood occurred world wide and covered even the highest mountain. It is evident that there are other groups of people who share a flood story, thus we can assume other people were protected by the warning of Yah himself. Noah wasn't mentioned as being the only man saved. The scripture is a base while other stories also help support the reality of the flood. With Yah, all things are possible.

  • It's not that those who believe in the accuracy of the bible are irrational, but those who do not believe are spiritually blind. Evidence can be found. However, the spiritually blind see but don't understand because their minds are dim.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more