Dennis Prager & Arianna Huffington debate Politics (1 of 4)

Discussing Huffington's book "Right is Wrong: How the Lunatic Fringe Hijacked America, Shredded the Constitution, and Made Us All Less Safe. . .
May 22, 2008. . .

search keywords: ron paul christopher hitchens ayaan hirsi ali andrew sullivan noam chomsky bill maher real time new rules keith olbermann rachel maddow ed schultz joe scarborough ann coulter glenn beck rush limbaugh sean hannity o'reilly dennis miller hugh hewitt michael medved john stossel larry elder shelby steele interview speech debate

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ron
• paul
• christopher
• hitchens
• ayaan
• hirsi
• ali
• andrew
• sullivan
• noam
• chomsky
• bill
• maher
• real
• time
• new
• rules
• keith
• olbermann
• rachel
• maddow
• ed
• schultz
• joe
• scarborough
• ann
• coulter
• glenn
• beck
• rush
• limbaugh
• sean
• hannity
• o'reilly
• dennis
• miller
• hugh
• hewitt
• michael
• medved
• john
• stossel
• larry
• elder
• shelby
• steele
• interview
• speech
• debate

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

Jesus, I really wasted my time here didn't I? You didn't listen to a single thing I said, hell - you didn't even try.

Fuck you if you're not going to pay attention to my comments, don't bother me again, AGAIN.

[sinkablehail]

@BelfastAtheist - Yes he brutalized people based on the idology of socialism and to enforce the ideology put forth by the mad man Marx - who was really a swell dude.

[andyz0007]

Fast forward to 2011, her position on global warming is shot to hell.

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

Please, don't bother me again.

Goodnight.

[BelfastAtheist]

@BelfastAtheist

6).. the U.S.S.R was Socialistic, they did this so that people would assosiate ''Socialism'' with State brutality (Which the U.S was of course committed elsewhere in the World at the time) - and so as to prevent Socialism being discussed about as a potential Political inititiave, much in the same fashion O'Reilly does now, except it's become (in most cases) too dangerous to interchangably use the word ''Socialist'' with ''Communist''

They were right, people (u) did belive it.

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

4) Stalin went against virtually every element of what Socialism is about.

5) The only 2 Countries that called the USSR 'Socialist' were the U.S and the U.S.S.R - the U.S.S.R did so to conjure up images of ''Utopian Socialism'' and to capitalise on the moral appeal that Socialism held to many Millions of Russians..

6) The U.S did so for opposite propaganda reasons, namely to try to discredit Socialism - because they believed their Country was foolish enough to believe that..

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

2) Socialism denotes a very broad range of ideas, I would ask you to specify which sort of Socialism you think Stalin practiced - though the fact that you think he was a Socialist in *any* way proves to me you couldn't answer the question if I posed it.

3)Socialism at a minimum advocates Worker Control of Industry, anything without that model can't be called Socialistic and in the USSR, the Workers were basically slaves.

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

There's *so* many logical fallacies and erroneous information in your two Sentences alone I might be here all night.. - I'll bullet-point it.

1) The ''Ideaology'' killed nobody, *Stalin* and his thugs killed and brutalized the USSR - he would have done it regardless - to argue against an ideaology because adherents to it commited wicked actions is a logical fallacy - I could use the same vacuous argument against Christianity, or indeed so-called ''Capitalism''.

[sinkablehail]

@BelfastAtheist How exactly can one support an ideology that has inflicted so much harm and destroyed so many individuals?

[weseyedwalk]

maybe God used evolution to create life