The Atheist Experience: Aaronk1994 and Other Issues

Jen Peeples and Matt Dillahunty commented on aaronk1994's suspension as well as other Youtube-related issues on the latest episode of the Atheist Experience (April 18th, 2010)

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• aaronk1994
• ShwaNerd
• TheShwaNerd
• atheist
• experience
• false
• flagging
• dmca
• matt
• dillahunty

[jay666KJ]

@AaronTheApologian

Yes, a 15 year old kid living in Texas wasn't indoctrinated. I could be wrong, but I've heard young brainwashed kid's claim they weren't indoctrinated in documentaries, yet the father in one clip is making it as clear as a rock is hard that they were indoctrinated. But what ever. Also, they arent stalkers, they were emailed and told about your video being pulled, didnt you watch the fucking clip?

[askegg]

Youtube is clearly not Matt's thing, and that's OK. However, YT is a community of people engaged in dialogue and it does have impact. Whoever makes claims for content they do not own (how many times have we seen that?) - they are assholes. Give Aron is account back!

[creeman007]

the atheist experience blocked me from commenting on their vdo's , i think i hurt their feelings cause they were sure personal in my inbox : )

[880330145789]

i feel weird watching this on youtube

[potsocket1]

i like how this video doesnt adress his arguements, they just attack them

[dkdj12]

I heard Matt crystal clear. He clearly said "some apologist". He defiantly did not even say YouTube.

[Moreba]

@YesYou123333 Yes, you are mad. My point is that he doesn't consider this individual to be lame for any other reason than for being an apologist

He wouldn't call him "lame" if he wasn't and he would probably call lame anyone who is an apologist. Writing in caps makes your point more valid

Considering someone's ideology lame is not the same as a personal insult

Was it an aimed comment? Of course

Was it personal? In my opinion it wasn't

Now argue about my opinion being wrong. I'm going for coffee

[YesYou123333]

@Moreba Who was the DMCA claimant lashing back at? Matt did not use an "S" after apologist. This means he is referring to a SPECIFIC person. Who is this specific person? Additionally, he used the word SOME. SOME, in this context, is a SPECIFIC reference. Who is this specific reference?  Now, go ask your English tutor to explain it to you.

[Moreba]

@YesYou123333 Are you mad? It looks like you are mad. Allow me to correct you now, since it seems like this is the game you want to play:

1

"You don't listen good do ya" = Wrong.

"You don't listen well. Do you?" = Right.

2

"If some fan of this show decided to lash back at some lame YouTube apologist"

I heard fine the first time. He said "some lame apologist". Again, he considers some people to be lame due to the fact they are apologists".Directed to all apologists not just the one you root for

[YesYou123333]

@Moreba You don't listen good do ya. Listen @ 2:45. Here I'll transcribe it for you..."If some fan of this show decided to lash back at some lame YouTube apologist...". Who is Matt referring to? He does not say "apologists" with an S. Is it clear enough for you now?