Is Bush planning an attack on Iran?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,622
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 14, 2007

More at http://www.therealnews.com
Aijaz Ahmad analyzes America's threats toward Iran

2007-09-14

"This administration is determined to attack Iran before it leaves office."




This is the first segment of a two part interview, Senior Editor Paul Jay talks with Aijaz Ahmad.

Based in New Delhi, Aijaz Ahmed is a Senior Editorial Consultant and political commentator for the Indian newsmagazine, Frontline. He has taught Political Science and written widely on South Asia and the Middle East.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Thats a bit harsh, the way governments act doesn't always represent how the American people think or agree with, just like a dictatorship Bush has been untouchable even with 3/4 of the American people disagreeing with him & cohorts polices, blame them not the people.

  • Not sure what you are questioning. The attack has been leaked and has been internet news for a few days. It takes 16000 centerfuges linked together to produce weapons grade nuclear material. Ahmendenajab has no authority to make war and the supreme leader who does belongs to a strict Shia sect that has zero tolerance for collateral damage and would not use a nuke.

see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You should see reality , no more holliwood, Your country has a debt that can not be paid and will come the time not so far away that the american empire will finish, caput, just see/read history,  it can not be denaid. Then it will be your turn to sufers. So lets try to leave in peace for sake of humanity

  • No, that is not the way. The problem is with America thirsty for oil so you can drive your big cars, and the big oil company get richer and richer, while your people will be poorer and poorer because what will come is a state in which the big corporations along the govrnment will have the control of your life. I have news for you if, you nuke Iran you will destroy civilization as we know it. So you can be proud of yourself.

  • so then you will have what in Irak is going on: about 4000 american soldiers and more than a millon of Iraquis including women and children. This is what you would like to see attacking Iran? Do you think nothing will happen to you; terrorism bring terrorism, and this is the true.

  • yours is a typical neo-lib position and an appalling indifference on humanity. A belligerent position will not give a chance to peacefully resolution of any  issue.

  • The international community is failing again

  • Breathtakingly shocking, the ease with which our pres., vp and others consider war with the loss of thousands of lives, and such destruction....this Iran situation, and the Alan Greenspan revelation that everyone knows it was about the oil... the kind of everyday acceptance of destruction and death that this regime operates with...watching their faces, there is little trace of such evil.

  • What has happened to our country? The elections are not soon enough and secondly these elitist bastards need to be stopped before they kill us all.

  • Loss of life is irrelivant. They consider us "expendable containers." Iran is next in line, in a string of long planned Middle eastern attacks for world domination. Period.

  • The CFR will have it their way, come what may. The plan to declare war on Iran appears part of the globalist agenda, even if it takes 10 administrations to see it come to fruition. Another travesty against humanity means nothing to these killers. It's the old WMD theory again, but this time they will use nukes! I pray that I am wrong! Peace to all!

  • It's just not worth it. Again, from the international affair point of view, the U.S. never takes a catalyst out of the equation. They need Iran as an excuse to meddle in the Middle East and sway the mass on will. On the other side of the fence, Mullahs obtain popularity through nationalistic mantra and strengthening their position in the region -- it's a symbiotic relationship.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more