Svensmark, CERN - Cosmic Ray Theory proven right - CBN News - August 31, 2011.wmv

Research by the prestigious European Organization of Nuclear Research supports the theory that periods of earth warming are caused by solar activity and so-called cosmic rays, rather than by human activity.

The findings of the landmark study, dubbed CLOUD, are rocking climate science.

The Svensmark Cosmic Ray Theory was developed at the Danish Space Institute.

The Earth is constantly being bombarded with cosmic rays, high-energy particles from exploding stars. The Svensmark Cosmic Ray Theory suggests that when these cosmic rays enter the Earth's atmosphere, they help create clouds.

An active sun strengthens a magnetic shield around the Earth that lets fewer cosmic rays get through. If the sun is less active, more cosmic rays get through. And the more cosmic rays, the more clouds, and the cooler global temperatures will be.

Reporting: Dale Hurd.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• CERN
• Henrik Svensmark
• Jens Pedersen
• Global Warming
• Global Cooling
• Cosmic Ray Theory
• CLOUD

[chronDiggity]

@greensense99

Yes, and even these commodities cost money to customers. Shit's not free you know. If these people had a way to save money on those commodities, they would take it. Who knows how quickly an invention from someplace like America would get to these developing countries, the point is right now we're allowing the fossil fuel industry to basically tell us not to even try.

What if some day all someone needed for all their electricity was just a place to grow some algae?

[chronDiggity]

@greensense99

Showed it, stop asking for the same damn thing over and over. This isn't a chat room you know.

[chronDiggity]

@greensense99

I don't make stuff up, I just repeat what I've learned. If I ever learn something that throws a big wrench in the whole theory, I actually tend to gravitate towards that more and remember that far more easily (since you know, it's what I WANT and all.) That's why I know these talking points have been debunked.

The latest one to get me were the thermal vents under the Arctic that I thought could be blamed for the melting. I was dead wrong.

[chronDiggity]

@greensense99

You mean the hockey stick Richard Muller confirmed with a Koch funded research grant? Lmfao

Here's a graph of our climate cycle for the past 450,000 years: ossfoundation(.)us/projects/en­vironment/global-warming/natur­al-cycle/images/450kyrs_GMT-Co­2_524x291(.)jpg

temperature and forcing levels of last 800,000 years:

ossfoundation(.)us/projects/en­vironment/global-warming/natur­al-cycle/images/Forcing-Temp_1­.9wm2(.)png/image_large

[greensense99]

@chronDiggity Secondly capitalism drives development, even in communist China, Oil and Coal rule because its easy to get, cheap, and reliable. Lets see the graph Mr. science.

[greensense99]

@chronDiggity man you live in some alternate reality, first off produce the graph of ice ages that show we should be cooling. This I have to see.

[greensense99]

@chronDiggity Nothing you say is verifiable your just making stuff up now.

[greensense99]

@chronDiggity Where can I find this graph you speak of, is it in the same paper as the hockey stick?

lol

[chronDiggity]

@greensense99

(continued)

The progressive liberal response to the sort of corporate communism we see in the fossil fuel industry is to use even more government to correct it. The republicans and democrats have done back and forth like this for years. You can see it in the health care bill. Back in 1945 we passed the McCarran Ferguson act granting insurance federal immunity from competition, 60 years later the democrat response is more government instead of a libertarian free market approach.

[chronDiggity]

@greensense99

What is the goal of every business in these expanding countries? Money. Profits. Energy efficiency is a marketable product. If company A promises company B savings of 25% each month in what they spend on energy, you don't think company B would invest in that? You don't think company A would get competition in the form of better energy savings and less cost? Fossil fuel has an unfair advantage through government, and so competition is near impossible.