Kent Hovind destroyed by Evolution Grad Student 2/3

About This Video
Kent Hovind destroyed by Evolution Grad Student...
Kent Hovind destroyed by Evolution Grad Student was produced by EGarrett01

http://youtube.com/user/EGarrett01

This video was pulled on 9/10/07 due to a fraudulent DMCA claim by the evil CSE! NOW IT HAS RETURNED! Fuck Kent Hovind and the CSE!

Driginal video description:

Kent Hovind is/was a Creationist lecturer and radio host. One night, he got a call from a Canadian pro evolutionist named "Martin," who sounded deceptively young. But when Hovind tried to attack him, he found that Martin was more prepared then he thought. It's one of the most thorough dominations of an Evolution/Creation debate that I've ever heard. The first few minutes of this clip were posted by someone else, so I figured I'd post the rest of it. Along with some visual commentary by me. Hope you enjoy it.

BTW, Kent Hovind is the higher, Southern-sounding voice. The third voice that occassionally shows up is Jonathan, Kent's co-host.
---
This video is available for download at:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=B8VE3SUD

Please repost! (give credit to the maker)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• copyright
• infringement
• Abuse
• Kent
• Hovind
• fucktard
• Creation
• Science
• Evangelism
• rabidape
• EGarret01
• dfarmer1584

[VvenomfangY]

Grad Student, you fucking rock. Excellent work!!

[anishray]

Yeah!, go grad student.

[nscangal]

Just google "platypus evolutionary tree" and select "what the platypus genome is and isn't". If you have access to Science Direct go and search "platypus evolution". Or google "monotreme evolution" and select "Evolution of the Monotremes: Phylogenetic Relationship to Marsupials and Eutherians, and Estimation of Divergence Dates Based on α-Lactalbumin Amino Acid Sequences". More searches would bring more evidence to light: The info is there, if you want to see it.

[simwrangler]

You say that the platupuss are rare descendants of a very distant branch of the mammalian tree, and is backed up with evidence? Where is this evidence? and who made this so called evidence up. Evidence is something you can see and witness. Who witnessed these so called evidence?

[TheAnasazi2009]

"Where's a half-dragonfly, half-platypus?" Classic!!!

[9pt9]

hovind and johnathan destroy martin every time. Why do you post these videos?? Its embarrassing to the evolution religion.

[hackenbollox]

I agree.

[GeorgesBarras]

What I mean is that any moral standard cannot be more than subjective. There can be no objective foundation for a moral claim.

[hackenbollox]

You say that like a claim is necessarily wrong. I assert that this is the basis for a consistent morality. More than that will require diligent mental effort, applied on a case-by-case basis. There are no easy answers. I can only offer a good place to start.

[GeorgesBarras]

But that in itself is a claim.

[hackenbollox]

Morality doesn't 'possess' anything. However; a simple standard can certainly be objective, such as 'my rights end where your's begin, and vice versa'.

[GeorgesBarras]

So can you claim that they posses objectivity? So long as they are a funtional phenomenon, their utility makes them subjective.