How It All Ends: No Holds Barred (Pt 5 of 6)

Part of the expansion pack accompanying the video "How It All Ends." Be sure to watch "How It All Ends: Index" and "How It All Ends: Menu" for a roadmap of where this fits in.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• global
• warming
• climate
• change
• controversy
• carbon
• debate
• risk
• management
• how
• it
• all
• ends

[TheMathDoctor1]

I've noticed that some of the comments here say nothing- they are just babble. There is no debate here. So far he seems to be the only one making any point here. The opposing responses mostly just sound ignorant.

[TheNatealator]

Sorry, I will correct myself. I have watched the videos out of order. Having just seen HIAE: The Solution 2/4, I see he does call for political action. He does this because he feels gov't is the only organization that can move fast enough and have enough scope. Can boycotts alone be enacted fast enough (if at all?) and still be large enough to affect the kind of corporations and people that are doing the most to harm the environment?

If so, start your own Manpollo Project, or join his.

[FenixLites]

@youbloodybetcha this is a much later installment and he is assuming you have already watched the other videos. the reason for that approach is simply unless you get a phd in the science you will most likely not completely understand the subject as even people with phds don't completely understand, does that mean that they should be ignored? no they still have a much clearer understanding. at the same time its about risk management and not understanding whether or not it is true.

[FenixLites]

@phantomscolts2 personal attacks don't prove your point.

[merowin]

I got a better quote about being an alarmist... or the likes:

The fact that I'm paranoid doesn't automatically mean that there aren't people out there trying to get me...

[youbloodybetcha]

While I appreciate WM42's well thought out video series, I found this particular video to contain a less-than-helpful response. The reaction to "I'm currently on the fence" seemed unnecessarily truculent to me. "WHY DO *YOU* NEED TO DECIDE", in a loud mocking tone, will cause people to either retreat or counter-attack. The reason *I* need to decide is because I'm the one contemplating taking action or not. If you're trying to prevail on me to help in this cause, your tone doesn't help.

[btester1]

Video is pure bullshit! Global warming policies are genocide and Murder.

Satan is talking.

[communistpianist]

@shodanxx

Yeah, but it took millions of years to recover from each cycle.

Good job.

That's what mass extinctions are. And if global climate change happens, we have to wait millions of years for your theory to pass. In the mean time, if the world starts flooding we'll blow each other up with nukes within maybe a year, at max a century just to satisfy your guessing. I don't know what other people think, but I say that maybe a million years is more than a century.

Nice going, shodanxx.

[bribeanbabybopdelux]

You have no idea about real history.

Did you know the A-bomb was develloped using occult knowledge.

Did you know that Japan had thrown in the towel months before the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, but the good ole US of A kept the war going until the bomb was ready to be dropped. Twice!

You dont because you trust the history you have been spoon-fed, and it has served you well-so far. Just like your science.

You have no clue of what you are saying and the implications of your aurgument.

[shodanxx]

who are you to decide ?

simple, the most important person in the democratic process

the voter

the person that will suffer the consequence of his decisions

if you don't convince him your only alternative is to try and shortcut the decision making of the governement (lobby)

until you convince the majority of the voters that what you say is true they will not act

you can bash them over the head with logic all you want

if they don't B E L I E V E, it will not happen

[shodanxx]

irreversible harm ?

where do you think all that carbon was before it turned into fossil fuels ?

why do you think we have evidence of megafauna of epic proportions, where do you think they got the food to evolve so big

that carbon used to be in the atmosphere and the earth was so full of life that such big creatures could survive

even if all the fossils fuels were mined and burned, how long do you think that damage could last ?

it's obvious the environement has had worse and it recovered