MAUS tank info - version 2
Top Comments
All Comments (101)
-
That's where combined arms come in. If the infantry or the armour can't deal with it you call in an air strike or an artillery barrage.
-
Nope. The one with the finished turret was send to Berlin, but it broke down a few km from the factory where it was built. It was destroyed by its own crew in order to prevent it being capture. The one at Kubinka is the one that got left behind in the factory, but fitted with the turret from the other.
-
Nope. The one with the finished turret was send to Berlin, but it broke down a few km from the factory where it was built. It was destroyed by its own crew in order to prevent it being capture. The one at Kubinka is the one that got left behind in the factory, but fitted with the turret from the other.
-
A tank that if you shot it would bounce of but the fuel tanks sitting a the back WTF?
at 1:12
-
Your use of grammar is most uncool.
-
sadly???? i feel GREAT ABOUT that thing not in battle..im an american and i know none of our ground unit ain gonna take out those basterd at that time
-
@liberalinthedesertaz it wasn't really a failure? ooohhh i doubt that. The King tiger would've fared better.
The German High Command was insane! The "Maus" had an enormous fuel consumption, was slow and heavy-handed. This tank borders on silly!
cyberarmy007 2 years ago 7
@farookbulsasra The good thing about this entering production is that it's slow, vulnerable and requires a lot of resources. A perfect candidate to shorten the duration of the war and drain materials from the manufacturing of other (better) German weapons.
TraustiGeir 8 months ago