William Lane Craig presents his case for the viability of intelligent design at Indiana University. His opponent was the eminent evolutionary biologist Francisco J. Ayala. This was the first time William Lane Craig had ever publicly debated the subject.
@MomoTheBellyDancer I just did. Read the commentary. Geez. You may then need to consult a wiktionary to know what I am speaking about.
MrWildbill20056 4 months ago
@MrWildbill20056
"There may well be other factors in play"
Then provide the evidence for it.
MomoTheBellyDancer 4 months ago
Actually it's valid to challenge the potential of randomly generated, selectable, heritable variation as a sole power house to evolutionary history. There may well be other factors in play, and in fact we know they are with transposable elements, retroviruses etc. It is important for the lay man not to think of evolutionary theory as 'complete.' As an evolutionary biologist myself, I can say there are a vast array of evolutionary sub theories flying around, it's fascinating stuff.
MrWildbill20056 5 months ago
Yes, all the youtubers here have made it through grad school and finished their dissertations. Therefore, they can justifiably call this man derogatory names for they are far more intelligent than he. Oh, wait....
whatisphreeon 7 months ago
This guy is such an idiot. I hate how he keeps saying Darwinism. What a tool. It's almost like he thinks if he puts enough big words together enough times that people will think he's smart. LOL. It's also funny how he keeps referencing Behe. What's the matter Craig, dont have another source for your BS? Why dont you use the Bible to support your claims? Dont you think it's the ultimate source of scientific knowledge like the rest of you morons?
DeusExAstra 7 months ago
WLC + biology = funny
pineconesaresmallnow 9 months ago
I lost respect for William Lane Craig the moment he used the term 'macroevolution'.
Alexdurrant7 1 year ago
oy oy oy the old canards about 'complexity' and whatnot. impossible to watch without the urge to choke his lying throat.
andrewridgway 1 year ago
The Mafia-approach: admit what is painfully obvious and deny anything else.
If Craig can't defend the historicity of Jesus he is clearly out of his depth.
StopSpamming1 1 year ago
Indeed!
However I publish it a month ago and nobody (but you) has paid atention to my questions...
Ah!, the smell of LWC BS!
hedleypanama 1 year ago