2002 NBA Playoffs: Kings @ Lakers, Gm 6 part 8/12
Top Comments
All Comments (89)
-
@gmh111286 If it were a fix, the refs would have allowed the Lakers to pull ahead by a much bigger margin, instead the game was extremely close. Why, if you are trying to setup a game for a team to win, would you allow the other team to come so close to winning? Hmmm, doesn't sound like a good job to me.
-
@gmh111286 what a moron you are. Why would I watch a biased, anti-Laker, pro-Kings video that is edited to only show when the Kings are wronged when I can watch the whole game, unbiased, uncut, right here??? Yes, I am a Laker fan, so what? That makes me biased but for a Laker fan, I am pretty unbiased when it comes to watching games. This series was horribly officiated, but for both sides. I can tell when there is a fix, this is not a fix, this was a poorly officiated game.
-
@RyZombie619 the only reason u won't admit this series wasn't fixed is cuz ur a lakers fan!!!!! duh!!!!!! why don't u watch the video on youtube about this series being fixed... or are u too blind cuz ur a lakers fan???
-
@Element141414 I ask this question again to another poor sap: then why didnt they win the championship? Oh wait, I already know what you're gonna say. Dont need to hear the same excuse again...
-
@Element141414 of course I look at that. Just because I am a Lakers fan and I don't think there was a fix, that doesn't mean I don't recognize bad calls. However, I just find that Kings fans don't care about the bad calls that went for their team, they just care about THEIR TEAM. I get upset when I see Bibby get hacked on the arm by Fisher and no foul call, that pisses me off. But so do people who don't think Divac and Pollard can commit fouls on SHaq...that is absurd.
-
@RyZombie619 Maybe, but you have to look at all of the MISSED calls that the refs didn't call on the Lakers. Noticable fouls commited by Los Angeles, with no foul call.
-
@Element141414 no, I did not notice that, maybe you should re watch the game. You'll see the Kings get bailed out on a lot of issues. Chris Webber should have fouled out of the game but didn't. Lakers shot 20 FT's because the Kings FOULED them, intentionally. So the Lakers shot around 13 or 14 unintentional FT's in the 4th. Dont forget, the Lakers shot 15 more Ft's than the Kings but the Kings shot 25 more FT's in the series than the Lakers. Dont use Ft's, they only hurt your case
-
@RyZombie619 Not ALL of the calls went one way, but most of them did. Sure, there were some bad calls on the Lakers. But, you have to notice the many, many bad calls on the Kings, especially in the 4th quarter, where Los Angeles took 20+ free throws.
-
Yo to all the fucking morons that this game was fixed you guys/girls are jackasses. The kings got all the benefit in game 5 now the Lakers got a few benefits, not a lot, in this game. Game 7 I thought was fair.
-
@Element141414 like??? I just watched the whole game. You can't tell me that the Lakers were getting all the calls and the Kings weren't. There were some BS calls that took out Kobe and Fisher in the first quarter, they let Webber stay in the game even though he should have fouled out, they called fouls on the Lakers towards the end of the game, quit being a moron and acting like all the calls went one way, they didn't.
The officials were hell bent on getting Vlade Divac out of the game because he was, for the most part, outplaying Shaq. The Kings could have survived all the other bullshit calls, but not the bullshit fouls called on Vlade.
wwefan1703 1 year ago 7
@javius1220 Don't be sorry. That is the truth, and everyone knows it. Kings = True 2002 NBA Champs
Element141414 8 months ago 2