I think the octaves from 4:00 onwards can be much more Lisztian and aggressive and that the climax at 5:35-37 can likewise be much more pronounced, crescendo and even rubato: one 2 3 4 5 6, tWO 2 3 4 5 6 (slight pause) THREE! ...
Personal taste, and because that's how I first heard it played (by Fou Ts'Ong).
the double c sharp after the cadenza is not wrong.there is the stirling edition with this octave and many pianists (famous) plays of course the better sounding octave.
hélas trop de pédale,beaucoup trop...le pianiste entend-il ce qu'il joue? dans quelques années sans aucun doute,il fera mieux,-l'inspiration est là!!!
Bravo...This Nocturne is very beautifull!!!!
AjkaTeckaAjik 1 year ago
Oh je donnerais tellement pour pouvoir jouer du piano, hélas je ne peux qu'en rêver...
Liloulollipop 3 years ago
I think the octaves from 4:00 onwards can be much more Lisztian and aggressive and that the climax at 5:35-37 can likewise be much more pronounced, crescendo and even rubato: one 2 3 4 5 6, tWO 2 3 4 5 6 (slight pause) THREE! ...
Personal taste, and because that's how I first heard it played (by Fou Ts'Ong).
iampauleybaby 3 years ago
Try to learn Ligeti Etude nr. 4 fanfares.. Then you know what you're talking about!
Bawedid 3 years ago
This was a nightmare to learn.
Daytrader2008 3 years ago
the double c sharp after the cadenza is not wrong.there is the stirling edition with this octave and many pianists (famous) plays of course the better sounding octave.
Achtelnote 3 years ago
hélas trop de pédale,beaucoup trop...le pianiste entend-il ce qu'il joue? dans quelques années sans aucun doute,il fera mieux,-l'inspiration est là!!!
antoinezygfryd 3 years ago
Excelente interpretación amigo!
Desde argentina, Flaco.
theloniousmonk81 3 years ago