Former U.S. Army officer John Nagl, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, met with General McKiernan last month and speaks with Martin Savidge about the threat posed in Afghanistan and why these troops are needed.
To learn more and hear from other guests on the topic, visit http://worldfocus.org/blog/2008/12/11/more-us-troops-could-secure-afghanistan...
Worldfocus video podcast: http://feeds.feedburner.com/worldfocus
Standing armies are made up of idealists and dreamers if You want a fighting force ? you need a draft , it has to be a war that the people
believe in it.WW1 and ww2 were those types of engagements today with the US army the military twits in charge can't win a war in a worn down third rate Third world country. So we have OoO strategy for exit and the chumps they are
hiring for the afghan army are all losers as bad as they are or worse.
US army needs to look in the mirror .
dave777blaster 1 year ago
Well, after what we've heard from Greg Gutfeld regarding Canada's contribution, it's pretty hard for Canadians to justify keeping their troops in Afghanistan
ManofColours 2 years ago
for afghans ti defeat the americans is very easy,first americans are scared to confront any fight,seconds these dumm ass have no coursge to fight,they always cry when something bad happens to them.they are just like a child mannered.they should have their mamas always with them to stop them crying.
sahibzai 3 years ago
political devils
Qu33nZyunGvET718 3 years ago
The Taliban said that the US will retreat like the Russians did when they invaded....I hope the US government knows what it is doing.
filmviewer7 3 years ago
another flunky telling us the US military should be an occupying force to protect foreigners. Occupying forces are the stuff of Imperialist powers. Someone smack this traitor in the head.
OmarThePug 3 years ago