Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nobel Prize in Chemistry Disproves Darwinism ?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,555
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 8, 2009

The amazing discovery of the structure of ribosomes presents a 'Chicken and Egg' problem that cannot be answered by Darwinism. Yet, evolutionists tend to believe it because the other option, Creator God, would be unthinkable for them.

  • likes, 36 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (141)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Genetic material is made up of Dyenyeah. Case closed. No need to listen further.

  • wow...what a sophistry .....it's an exact epitome of sophistry...

    his point is like " An eagle and hen have wings. Since eagles fly, hen has to fly "

    His comparisons are illogical to what he wanted to say...

    I do believe that there are many things which are not explained by Science.

    But Science keeps on answering unanswered questions in past.

    It doesn't mean that since Science has not yet explained or answered the mysteries/questions God created them.

  • but didnt dna still have to arise after that? adn if so, do we not coem back to the chicken and egg again?

  • Do you mean that ribosomes just evolved into proteins and their interaction started a blueprint for life by means of time within their atomic structure? And this programme went into self induced propagation of its direction? I don't really get the point here. It is just knowledge in initial placement in relation to its evolution. To make it chicken or egg equivalent is a little simple, or am i astray here?

  • Do you mean that ribosomes just evolved into proteins and their interaction started a blueprint for life by means of time within their atomic structure? And this programme went into self induced propagation of its direction? I don't really get the point here.

  • @paulkrist44 You said it. Indian society is spiritually-materialistically balanced.Hinduism is a conglomerate of diverse beliefs and practices under the sun,all suited to individual temperaments.There is actually no need for any narrow-minded, intolerant, fraudulently pushed religion.But these guys bring lots of money from abroad, collect donations hiding the true purpose of trading for conversion. Xianity is a big barrier to progress of science and society. It is an anachronism in modern world.

  • 2 This is religious fanaticism and intolerance, and it short-circuts reasonable argument and is unwarranted and distorts the discussion which borders on philosophy of bridging the gap bet. living and nonliving. No religion needs to be dragged into the discussion.

  • Call it God or, more agreeably to scientists and rationalists and atheists, just a superpower or superintelligent cosmic entity. And it can be a conscious entity. Man wants to bring in human form just because he likes that entity. This gentleman in the video goes further to speak of Jesus as the son of god, and preposterously wants all to come embrace Jesus as thiugh every nonChristian should discard his own faith.

  • @madoo87 S -stands for svedverg unit it is sedimentation coefficient. it is actually measure of time and is defined as exactly 10^13 seconds (100 fs). r u really a biochem major???

  • @GERONAMI u r a fucking idiot there are rRNA in ribosomes actually the peptidyl transferase site in 50S subunit is it self a domain of RNA have'nt u heard the term ribozymes

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more