Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Quantum Gravity - unified theory?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,507
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 2, 2007

Geoff Haselhurst posits a wave-structure for matter. He claims it unifies quantum physics and gravity...

  • likes, 16 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Everything is just a wave, matter and anything with mass just have a wavelength smaller than the quantum planck distance. That's why it's not detected and they behave like particles instead of waves.

    You are familiar with the double slit experiment?

    Anyways, these theories have been worked out and expanded up quite a bit since you made this video.

  • @OctoberLifeImages A laymans explanation/links of space resonance: octoberlife. deviantart. com /art/Fluctuations-206892279

see all

All Comments (159)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Esoparagon It doesn't matter much :) However I will say an appeal to ignorance will accomplish nothing here. One question: How can we experience a 3D space, regardless of its nature, if it doesn't exist? Evolution works in 3D - our sensory and nervous systems convert sense data gathered in a 3D space into our experiences of and within it. This doesnt neccesarily exclude space from having properties, nor from being the infinite (not bound by a second substance) medium manifesting all

  • @OctoberLifeImages I didn't make any sort of argument of that kind at all. I have no idea what this a response to because I certainly made no arguments that would be refuted by this since it's got nothing to do with what I'm arguing.

  • @Esoparagon Ultraviolet wavelengths are invisible to your ocular receptors but if you could detect them they might have a gentle hue of purple ;) Just because something is invisible to the (only apparent) seamless continuum your brain constantly plays back to you as a backdrop to the narratives of your cognitive experience doesn't mean their color or existence is negated :)

  • @OctoberLifeImages No amount of evidence or creative interpretation thereof will convince me that invisible purple objects exist.

  • @Esoparagon I need not get into the evidence that space is a continuous, tensile medium with properties to show that your "nothing" hypothesis is wrong. Funny that you posit a "luminiferous ether" in that absence! The secondary and profound irony I see in this discussion is that space resonance implies "emptiness, nothingness, the formless form" - Tao concepts that have existed for thousands of years - is what gives rise to the infinitude of temporal forms.

  • @Esoparagon So by assuming space is nothingness based on a semantical argument, you are making a special plea. The mathematics (including less abstract maths that describe reality with uncanny precision), as well as a substantial amount of emperical and experimental/observational data, disagree with your hypothesis.

  • @Esoparagon What I find ironic is your statement that mathematics is only as useful as long as it is actually describing reality, while at least partially true, is slightly erroneous considering that mathematics and reality describe each other extremely well, while language alone falls several orders of magnitude short by comparison.

  • @Esoparagon Your mistake (which in no way is attributed to a lack of intelligence) is the assumtion (and it IS an assumption) that the etymology of a word we have used to describe the geometrical area that objects exist in is correct in describing reality, which is not the case.

  • @Esoparagon Not to mention his other paranoia and obsessions, such as with pidgeons and numbers divided by three. The problem here is in etymology, I argue. Many of us understand the word space as "empty, nothing, the lack of substance" because historically, its semiotics imply an empty geometrical area that objects can exist in.

  • @Esoparagon It is definitely not self evident to a critical, skeptical thinker. A true scientific thinker questions their own logic endlessly. Upon his false predication (assumption, really) that space is an empty medium that zero dimensional objects can exist within and act upon each other through fields and force carriers is yet another logical leap. Nikola Tesla also believed that if he created a "death ray" it could be used to end all war.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more