9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 4

9/11 was fake man. Why would all these people lie about secondary explosions going off? Were they all conspiracy theorists? Hell no!

This was a great debate sorry but everything that loose change is based on is heresay and bullshit. Everytime they are approached with facts they come back with more heresay. Conspiracy theorists are paranoid morons who need to drop this its not doing any good. 1000s and 1000s of pages of study, the engineering world agrees with the official account of what happened. Two dipshit film students have made a fortune off this.

@Draysanman
I disagree. They acknowledge that the initial reasons given for 7's collapse need to be looked at more.
Someone knowing nothing about this debate, coming to it without bias, would see this-in my opinion- for the separating of men from boys that it is.

..and they wonder why there are conspiracies? Release the tapes, boxes and acknowledge the truth about everything.

Right, it needs to be "looked at more" so that the final analysis fits the "official report." Modern steel structures don't fall at free fall speed simply because they're burning. Look at ANY controlled demolition and you'll see that building 7 fell in exactly the same manner.

@2210ethan
Building 7 didn't topple to one side, then lurch forward, then lean backward as it burned. This is how it would've fallen had fires caused the collapse. Instead, It fell at free fall speed into a nice pile just like a controlled demolition.

@Draysanman
But it wasn't only fires that caused the collapse, was it?
And yes, in the uncertainty of that day, people said all kinds of things. From the time of the second plane, what was going on was anyone's guess, no-one could have said anything that would have sounded too extreme, all bets were off. That's why it's easy to find quotations which support the 'truth' kids, even when the people who said them don't.

That's EXACTLY how people would look at this if they knew nothing of the debate, which is EXACTLY why various news reporters stated that building 7 fell as if it were a planned event.

@JackSchitt100
How ironic. A dumbass named JackSchitt telling someone else that they're retarded. OMG, somebody help me! the foundation of my beliefs regarding 911 are totally destroyed now because your dumbass called me a few names, all the while thinking that your shit-talking somehow makes you credible. You should change your name to Jackschitthead...because.....y ou're a shithead that doesn't know JackSchitt, Jack. Frickin' unthinking dumbass.

Thank you for proving my point..and i just called you a retard..i dont have to call you names ur views on the matter say it all..