Dawkins Trys To Defend The Assumptions Of Evolution As Science

According to Richard Dawkins Evolution can't explain how it all began, so why is Creation Science excluded? Creation Scientist are more qualified to teach science than evolutionists, because they rely on science not assumptions! Christians did more to develop and shape science than any atheist. Dawkins has stated that the sequence of DNA is a language. Well how do you get language without intelligence? I guess you become an evolutionist...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Science
• Creation
• Evolution
• Richard Dawkins
• Creationist
• Missing Link
• Fossils
• Fossil Records
• Up Right Walking Ape
• Modern Science
• Homo Sapiens
• Comparative Anatomy

[dragonfan1981]

"God of the gaps" argument. What a load of shit! Science doesn't enhance the human condition in any moral way? Christianity would make the world perfect? What about Buddhism or Jaininsm? Science classes should teach us about things that can be observed. The origin of life has no bearing on evolutionary theory.

[icimblind]

@dragonfan1981

" Science doesn't enhance the human condition in any moral way? "

That's not true. Think about all the advancements science has brought us and how it is being positively used. No other faiths have more truth in them than Christianity and science can prove this. Yes, science classes should teach us about things that can be observed, like the millions of transitional species that are severely lacking in the theory of evolution. The origin of life influenced Darwin's theory.

[ruandanj]

just a quick question to creationists : why do creationists try force public school systems to teach "creationism" in schools?

evolutionists don't go to theistic institutions and try to force them into teaching evolution...

the two concepts are different in origin, nature and in practice.

the major difference is - religion is stagnant and science is not.

[icimblind]

@ruandanj

Evolutionaunts do force their belief system on everyone else because they are taking legal action in the courts.Evolution is a theory, an unproven one at that because it fails the scientific method. Creationist are not asking that the bible be taught in biology classes, just to have an alternative that an antiquated theory. I think many people are confused in the differences of each theory. Historically & factually, Christianity is any thing but stagnant. It created modern science!

[ruandanj]

@icimblind ooooo...yeah i think you'r right...didn't daniel invent the lightbulb...moses had some newtonian tendancies ....

honestly- i cannot see any evidence that any of the authors of the bible used scientific methods to prove/disprove any of the questions concerning their religion...

the "necessary" action, in those days, was dictated by the head of the clan, you might say...and his notions came in dreams/visions and from talking animals or plants.(very scientific hey).

[icimblind]

@ruandanj

Hey, no problem, you've just revealed your ignorance. It happens all the time. Please research who started colleges, universities, & the disciplines of modern science. Who created the scientific method? Yup. & if you were able to read the posts instead of acting like an evolved jackass you'd know that there were many scientific facts revealed in the bible thousands of yrs before scientists discovered them. Yes sir, evolutionaunts believe they evolved from a rock, & they R right!

[Vehementi]

@icimblind What makes you think "Creation science" can just skip that out and be taught in science class because a few nutjobs believe it's true? Submit it to scientific and methodological testing and analysis, hold it up to the same torch that Evolution has been over the past 150 odd years. See if it stands up to attempts at falsification that evolutionary theory has.

You won't do that, will you? You only want it taught in science class to brainwash people into your religion.

[abmackay]

@batrider Believe me I'm on your side here... but although the evidence strongly suggests abiogenesis DID happen, the mechanism is not actually known (ie. not a "fact"). Fortunately, there have been many experiments showing ways it *could have* taken place, all of them really interesting. However, barring the invention of time travel to observe it firsthand in the Hadean eon, abiogenesis and its mechanism(s) will always be theory (in the proper scientific sense) rather than "fact".

[Thetruuth1]

@Vehementi

And what makes you think evolution has passed the scrutiny of the scientific method? It hasn't ! Peer review has given us many evolutionary frauds throughout time! Talk about falsification. That's a fact, also why is this theory still being taught as an unproven theory for the last 150yrs?

Evolution implodes on itself every time it tries to prove itself. What empirical evidence do you have that we all come from a single celled self replicating organism? LOL !

You're DeLuSiOnAL !

[Thetruuth1]

Was it evolutionary scientists that created modern science? NOT

Hello,evolution has not been proven as fact.It is still being taught as a unproven theory! Every one knows this. How many times has it imploded on itself when they did try to prove it in the labs through testing?You put up one part of evolution that hasn't been disproven. Make sure you Google the counter argument. Do you realize the evidence you'd need to prove we came from a single self replicating organism?

[stauguastine]

@ruandanj Biblical Creationism was taught in our public schools up and until the 1960's. Therefore, it was taught when the framers of the constitution were alive and well who did not see any issue with teaching creationism in the public school. I am not forcing any particular view but when atheists deny the opportunity to teach a competing view they are guilty of the very thing you accuse creationists.

[icimblind]

@yarmantc

Your logic fails! Never said science isn't true, but not all things claimed to be "science" are true. Of course evolution is not science. It is an antiquated theory that has never been proven, and therefore it is Not fact. Every one knows this. I have no problem allowing it to be taught in an English class as fictional reading,or a history class on how it shaped the minds of atheistic dictators in justifying the slaughter of millions.

Evolutionaunts are like Harry Potter readers!