Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC 7 was on fire at 9.30 am

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,497
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 4, 2008

I told you that building 7 was on fire before the towers fell,
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=XICqbxLVuSY
and now here is the clip in wich Matthys Levy, structural engineer, told this. So if no debris caused the fire, what did it?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (footjob56)

  • so?... buildings also burn for 24 hours.. 3 day's or longer.. it's the kind of collaps that's so wrong about the whole "story".

  • Right, but someone told that the fire, in building 7, started after north tower collapse not before. Then why building 7 was on fire so soon? How did it begin to burn?

Top Comments

  • everybody know by now that bldg 7 was a inside job

  • How the fuck does the most protected building in new york with top technology not have a sprinkler system to put out fires? America is going to change soon. How will the people react when they find out it was a lie.

see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i'd like to know how falling debris starts fires in the first place

  • @forthe9two5 It did have Sprinkler System

    But it had to be manually turned on by someone in the building,but it couldnt because everyone was evacuated from the building

  • @AccessDenied55 Well, it is "wired" that they managed to do the job in half a day. Prepearing for a pulling like this takes weeks of preparations.

  • hey! genius so what the building was on fire so was a steel structured building in madrid spain that burned for hour's and never collapsed building 7 didn't burn not even close to as long and it collapsed yeah! right 7 had help falling these were the only steel structured buildings that were taken down by fire in the history of the world wake up !

  • dude... 9:30 am... wtf... that's such blatant evidence of pre-planning

  • @coppercabxx Liar asshole! Bin Laden was a honey farm operator in southern Thailand! Fucking dumb ass douche

  • Im no theorist but if the people who so called "pulled" WTC7 were smart.

    They probably didnt want to waste all that money reparing WTC7 after all that fire damage and debris damage it has sustained. So technically whats so "weird" about that?

  • Mr. Levy told NOVA that the towers came down because the jet fuel melted the structural steel. That's loony tunes. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel.

    See my video:

    The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers

  • There is no indication of fires in WTC7 before the Twin Towers collapse.

    The firealarm wasn't activated until the first tower, WTC2, had collapsed.

    Either Mathews Levy did mistakenly said 9:30 instead of 10:30am or he spread willingly disinformation.

  • @forthe9two5

    the sprinklers in 7 were turned off on 9 11 at around 8 am.

    source: BBC's attempt at debunking wtc 7

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more