Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Originalt filter vs konfilter

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,919
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 22, 2007

Effektmåling av Golf 3 1,8 med originalt filter vs konfilter. Flere påstår stor effektøkning (10%) ved å bytte ut originalfilteret, så vi ville komme med håndfaste bevis på at dette ikke stemmer.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @urbex2007 umm not entirely true. wat good is it to have a foot long surface area of a filter wen the stock intake opening is only an 1 inch and half?

  • At last-someone exposes aftermarket products as a total con. The surface area of the correct VW filter is 13times bigger, so the holes in that cone need to be more than 13 times BIGGER to allow the same amount of air through. That also means that the cone IS NOT FILTERING to the standard of a paper element. That is why I stick to the correct filter especially when the car has a turbo. Anything other than the correct filter causes premature wear and lots of damage as I found with a K&N.

    .

  • Did you only compare max hp?

    You should check from low to high revs and see the differerence.

  • No real Diference ! hahaha

    sport filter= waste of money and more dust to damage the engine.

  • Det siste du sa i hele klippet var den beste kommentaren ! :P

  • so u can see the truth about open air filters...

  • Jeg syns redigeringen av denne videoen er helt genial!!! :P

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more