Palin says she will overturn Roe vs Wade in Gibson interview
Top Comments
All Comments (27)
-
Ask a legal opinion from someone who needed six years, at five colleges, to obtain a 4 year degree (in "communications",whatever the hell THAT may be), and what did you expect? The reasoning of a Cardozo, Holmes, or Marshall?
No wonder she's the darling of the Brain Dead Right!
-
I made an error and you wish to continue to bring it up - well, at least I correct my mistakes - you apparently have not. By your lack of manners and childish behaviour. Congradulations - you've proved yourself to be a jerk.
-
Here's what you initially said, and you can't erase it now. Too bad---people will still know you're a boob:
"Interesting abortion was once legalized and there were many people, such as yourself, that fought to prevent it from being overturned."
-
Correction: I had meant to say that slavery was once legalized. My apologies for the error.
-
"Interesting abortion was once legalized.."
It still IS legal, you boob.
-
Interesting abortion was once legalized and there were many people, such as yourself, that fought to prevent it from being overturned.
-
And yet you have no problem with women deciding on killing their unborn babies - you already admitted that those women DO know they are killing their unborn babies and yet you don't find that sick. How sad.
-
Your hatred and venom is clearly evident - I'm surprised anyone would want to agree with you. Given your clear hate.
-
White Privilege at its Finest!!!
-
yeah exactly. When her son rapes her (both rape and incest, happy thoughts!) and she willl have changed her mind.
That is what makes me sick about this, they are all up on their high horse telling people how to live, making choices that they shouldnt make for people.
As usual, people of your ilk work overtime in confusing the real issue, which is A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHAT HAPPENS TO HER OWN BODY. I've never met one single solitary person who is FOR abortion. However, the right to one if they so choose is and should remain nobody's business but their own - regardless of the reason she chooses to have one.
Now go and get ready for your RAPTURE and leave us intelligent people alone.
boohface62 3 years ago 6
this woman is a disgrace. how can you not want to take away peoples rights to assault weapons but take away a womens right to choose if they want to keep a rape or incest kid? this coming from a owner of a ak-47 and a sks? I mean this lady is not qualified at all. the answers given to "charlie" are just spin! she will repeat herself when she can't give a honest yes or no answer cause she has no clue what the question means. only ignorant people would think she is qualified to be vice president.
MClown69 3 years ago 4