Jeffrey Dahmer interview (audio)

An old interview with Jeffrey Dahmer I found on my computer I thought I would upload.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• dahmer
• jeffrey
• serial
• killer
• interview

[SwapMeetFlea]

God. Okay, I can see that Jeffrey Dahmer was not, in some photos, a bad looking guy at all, but to talk about him in such a casual way, as if he's some sort of light-hearted Hollywood heart-throb, is very disrespectful to those who lost loved ones because of his cannibalistic, necrophilic fantasies. You can have your opinions, your feelings, but, please, have some DECENCY too!

[tjkid15]

@Konjammenson even if he did hate himself for what he did, I have absolutely no sympathy for this Sick worthless fuck.. I dont care how his childhood affected him , what he did is just not normal.. its inhumane.. i bet if he was still alive and hadn't been caught you'd find more dead/missing Men and boys.

[lynwoood123]

how much money did the victim family got from jeffrey or did they get any?

[Jklsays101]

Girls are so scary.

[jenwasverydrunk]

He was good looking but he got ugly at 0:24. Think its the glasses and looks like he dyed his hair dark.

[CallMeMrX]

You can say what is right and what is wrong, on an evolutionary level, and a moral level, is is within us to care and feel compassion for living things, and those in our tribe/community, regardless of the scope or scale, or technological advancements, therefore, for the survival of our species, it is 'wrong' to kill everyone.

[darevblue]

@tjkid15 of course, it wasnt normal what Jeff did, such horror isnt normal at all, he had an inhuman bad childhood and youth.....and due to it terrible compulsions he never wanted. when he was in prison he was glad that he couldnt kill anymore. you dont need to have sympathy for him, but you need more understanding what had happened to him that he became emotionally so sick. he was a victim who made compulsively victims and didnt know why because he had repressed his traumas.

[spunkets]

@CallMeMrX

I suppose it was our "innate moral values" that compelled us to bomb millions of other human beings (presumably possessing "innate moral values") in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, Cambodia, and Viet Nam, back into the stone age.

"Innate moral values," my ass.

As for "how long our species will last," we're among the newest on the planet. Species come and go daily. Do you imagine human beings are somehow exempt from extinction?

Oh that's right. We're superior to all the rest.

[CallMeMrX]

You do realize we are all born with innate moral values, just like our primate cousins.

If we didn't, we would not have survived as a species.

Sure you can say nothing is wrong or right, but then you get into philosophical nothingness with no conclusion.

As humans, it isn't natural to want to murder your own kind for sexual please. IF our brains were all wired like Dahmers, ho long do you think our species would last?

[spunkets]

@TheMeekgurl

So to summarize my initial statements pertaining to Dauhmer:

Of course what he did isn't "right." But no one can provide the least amount of evidence that what he did was "wrong" either, no more than you can punish a tornado for slamming down a bus load of school children in a cornfield.

You err when you divide the behavior of human beings from that of nature, and all your moral platitudes, however highly-revered, are utterly powerless.

[spunkets]

@TheMeekgurl

"Killing is good when necessary."

Who decides that? You? Your family? Your community? Your country? Your god?

What about the person(s) getting killed? Don't they have something to say about it? Are they suppose to just lay face down on the ground and plead for a bullet to the back of the head b/c YOU think killing them is good?

cont.....

[DamienRUs666]

@tjkid15 humans killing other humans for pleasure has been around for as long as humans have existed. calling it inhumane and not normal just shows how little you know of the human brain. what you should be saying is "damn nature....you scary..."