Condoleezza Rice for European Union President. Condi in the ring.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
946 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 11, 2009

Rice for President - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rice-for-president/
For Freedom Forums - http://figh.tk
Peter Dow's website - http://scot.tk

Condoleezza Rice for President of the European Union.

Condoleezza Rice, the former US Secretary of State under President Bush would have made a great president of the USA and still may do, perhaps if she runs in 2012 but until then we Europeans should give Condi a wee shot of being President of Europe. If she is elected US president, she can decide if she wants to be president of both the EU and the USA or just the USA.

Can an American become the President of Europe?

Why not?

Europe does not have closed borders - no-one has set up a new iron curtain have they? People come from all over the world to study and to work in Europe. I have Indians living to my left, right and above me and most welcome they are.

If you have skills anywhere in the world, Europe has a job for you - this is true in the private and public sectors, so what's the problem?

It would be stupid and self-harming not to hire the best in the world for Europe's MOST important job, president of the EU and Condi is the best, so hire her.

How hard can it be to make Rice a citizen of a EU member country if that was the rule? After they captured him in WW2, the Americans made Wernher von Braun the German rocket scientist (who was working for Hitler trying to bomb us all to hell) an American citizen didn't they, and so got to the moon? So what matters is if the foreigner has the skills that your union needs.

Citizenships can be granted if required I suppose.

There is supposed to be a new EU constitution - I think they call it "the Lisbon Treaty" or something. Has anyone here read it? I have not but The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union looks good and I didn't see anything in there about "Americans not welcome".

I know the US constitution says you need to have been born in the USA to become president, though not to be elected a state governor. Well Europe should improve upon that rule.

More (60+) Condi videos by this author -
Peter Dow For Condi (YouTube group)
http://www.youtube.com/group/dowforcondi

All YouTube videos by this author. Peter Dow TV -
http://www.youtube.com/group/pdviewers

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (riceforpresident)

  • this is a joke right? a yank as the president of the eu council? the arrogance to think that we need more American influence in Europe. isn't it illegal in America for a foreigner to be the

    i'm all the best person for the job but its not someone from the former bush

    administration

  • fionn18 - No that smeg-head Van Rompuy is the joke.

    I am a Scot. The really arrogant ones are from Europe - the monarchies, esp. the Windsors.

    Stuff the new EU law and constitution which says that we don't get to elect our EU President. That is undemocratic in my book.

    We don't just want "someone" to do "a heck of a job". We should want Condi because she IS the best person to be president.

    Too much to debate here, please register with the For Freedom Forums

  • How many of you have actually done research on the current candidates, is this women the most qualified because she is american and recognizable to you?

    I mean jeeze, this is just too stupid for my liking.

    Its almost like a sick joke which anti-eu morons are using as a new tactic to scare people.

    If thats the case, congrats, your original.

  • MrMcQ2u - Most of the candidates talked about are established royalist politicians from countries with a royal as head of state, king, queen, duke whatever.

    If such a royalist becomes President of Europe that will make their monarch he remains the subject of, the new king of Europe.

    Hence why the European kingdoms are pushing their top lackeys like Blair to run for President so that they can expand their kingdom to all of Europe.

    We MUST have a republican and Condi is the best.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Its such a shame that she is serious when she says she has no want to hold national office and rather just stay behind teaching at Stanford and writing she would make a wonderful President of the United States!

  • Never going to happen. Condoleeza Rice is from the US, nobody would vote for her and she wouldn't even be allowed, the same way a person from Europe or any other foreign place in the world wouldn't be allowed to become the president of the US (although, they be a governor e.g. Arnold Schwarznegger came from Austria and is the governor for California)

  • I mean you don't even know anything about the lisbon treaty, never mind the treaties that went before it.

    And you think your opinion is valid, how the hell do you know who is best for the job.

    Your view is so blatantly subjective it smacks you in the face.

    Sorry but I wont base my view from subjective information.

    Maybe you would have a better time trying to get Americans to vote for a Non-US citizen as their president.

  • Sorry but I refuse to take that answer seriously.

    Not all canditates are publicly known yet and the majority are not from royalist countries.

    Choosing a republican would be just as damaging as choosing a royalist politician.

    And I find it hard to believe that we cannot find the right person for the job within the eu territories.

    I don't know why I am getting worked up over this, this has about as much chance of happening as my cat articulating its political views.

  • haszo - You only care about what Popes think?

    Pope Pius thought war against Hitler was a crime and your "Pope" Annan thought war against Saddam was a crime even though AGGRESSOR Saddam had broken every law in the UN Charter and declaration of Human Rights.

    In neither case did we freedom fighters waste much time debating law with the papist cowards with their inquistion ways.

    No your Pope didn't mention Abu Ghraib when for years Saddam used that place to torture, murder and rape.

  • I don't give damn what you think a War Crime is, it is laid out in international law. It not a debatable point.

    The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in September 2004 that: "From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, it [the war] was illegal."

    The Security Council may only authorise the use of force against an "aggressor". Iraq was not an aggressor, it had not attacked the United States or the United Kingdom.

    Not to mention Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo Bay.

  • haszo - Well you have much in common with those who dragged Galileo in front of the Roman inquisition for daring to say that the earth went around the sun.

    So, Pope before science then?

    War is not a crime if it is for justice, freedom and democracy.

    She is no more a criminal than Éamon de Valera who fought for Irish freedom.

    Is it only freedom-fighting political scientists like Condi you want to punish, whereas terrorists and dictators you think should get off with their crimes?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more