http://www.drjudywood.com
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com
9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7892004186194307613
9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6714196008143117547
Dr. Wood shows that the authorized "9/11 truth movement" theory i.e. conventional controlled demolition, is not supported by the evidence. The seismic signal (as well as the visual evidence) shows that the Twin Towers did not actually collapse or hit the ground. The buildings actually turned to dust, including most of the steel, which can be seen on various clips.
---
Jason Bermas censors Discussion of Judy Wood - 21 May 2010
mp3 - http://www.mediafire.com/?vbmm1tptgrlm3m8
The "truth movement" is part of the 9/11 operation, covering up the evidence and supplying the public with their leaders and their authorized theories.
Steven E. Jones was involved in the Cold Fusion cover up in 1989 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=v...
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Lenin
This deception can only really be confirmed by studying the evidence for yourself, rather than relying on other people's opinions (or misrepresentations/dismissals) of that evidence.
---
Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson on TNS Radio, September 14th, 2010, discussing the World Trade Centre destruction and the "9/11 truth movement" cover up.
mp3 (2hours 39mins - 27.4 MB) - http://www.mediafire.com/?rk5dan983j8kb25
Andrew Johnson's website - http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms
Partial transcript from here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7LK3CTY7Fg
AJ: [Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth] was started [in 2006] at around the time that [Dr. Judy Wood] filed the Request For Correction - http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html ...
JW: [It was] 3 weeks later.
AJ: ... We privately have discussed whether these two events were connected. But anyway this group ... proudly proclaim on their website that you can make a tax deductible donation to them now - so it's essentially government affiliated.
JW: But what that means is that they can't lobby Congress for a new investigation.
AJ: Well there you go. ... Anyway, I want to read out a little bit of the letter - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=v... - because there's another chap we know called Abe [Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez]. And he joined the A&E for 9/11 truth group ... and signed their petition because if you sign the petition you are said to be a member. And he wrote to them and said to them "have you heard about the Dr. Wood research into the directed energy weapons? You should look into this." And they wrote back and said:
"We decided to remove you from our list of petition signers because, whether you knew it or not, we have chosen to carefully limit the scope of our message to the collapse of the World Trade Center and the need for a new investigation that would specifically consider the use of explosives in bringing it down. Our message is displayed on our website in the petition and mission statement. The evidence supporting our message is also found on our website, which I am sure you have seen since you signed our petition.
Your suggestion about contacting Judy Wood and engaging in a discussion [which is what Abe suggested] with her about her theories [careful choice of word from them there] about directed energy weapons and other things is a suggestion for action that is outside the scope of our message. We would lose more than we would again. If nothing else we would lose the time required to make such a contact and engage in a discussion / debate whose duration would be unknown. We are also well aware of Judy Wood and her theories. The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message."
So you know, it goes on a bit after that but you can see they've got the scope of their message, but there's no mention of evidence and there's no mention of truth. And there's no mention of the Qui Tam case - http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml - for example, and how this has been put into a legal framework. So they're basically happy to ignore all of that and lead all these other thousand members essentially down a blind alley.
JW: But they were notified about the case going to the Supreme Court and one of the members emailed it to Richard Gage and his, you know, core agents there. And they were angry, wrote back and said we don't want to ever hear about this again.
AJ: Yeah that's right. We've got this from somebody who's involved in this group: "Marshall I am not interested in the topic of this email. Do not include me on any future emails."
And this was in response to .
JW: an announcement that it was going to the Supreme Court.
Loading...
1:17:02
Richard.D.Hall interviews Dr Judy Woods on 9/11 truth.by jamnoise721,733 views
So "torsion" is definitely involved in Dr. Woods conclusions.
uutttg 1 week ago
Good interview. I just wanted to comment about when the interviewer said "beware of these other theories" and he mentioned "torsion weapons". Its a kind of torsion weapon that Dr. Wood is describing if you follow the details. In her book she outlines the details of a High Pressure system rotating in one direction meeting a system rotating in the other direction, Hurrican Erin. This is indeed two counter-rotating systems...and this is what torsion physics deals with.
uutttg 1 week ago
@mujaku atleast you get it! I ask people about the cars,Hurricane Erin,the Bankers Trust building the bent beams and must don't even know about them and if they do they come out with some werid answers.
I can't see how a burning cars can have unburnt paper right next to it?Most say the fire has to jump!Never had a camp fire I'm guessing!
I'm sure you will understand this topic... watch?v=v-0LPyo92wc&list=FLJoLKgA6rQ_a_qjj56e1y2A&index=1&feature=plpp_video
sparkie72 2 months ago
@sparkie72 Yep. Each of the two towers is about 500,000 tons each. Most of this mass just disappeared into cold dust. Neither pancaking, a nuke nor the thermite hypothesis can explain the loss of such mass. Dr. Judy Wood's detractors can launch ad hominem attacks until they are blue in the face. But it is only a diversion. It is a refusal to answer the question, "Where did the towers go?"
mujaku 2 months ago
@belowthepovertyline Yes,hidden in plain sight.They have been patented and if you use your keyboard and the info. highway you your can find for yourself.The enslavement is more along the lines of petrol prices,using fuel for cars,having electrical meters on ones home. As for the number of the cars,isn't the damage to the cars more the question than the numbers?
sparkie72 2 months ago
@offthahook08 Micro nukes?Where are the radiation readings? Thermite may have been used to cut the beams,but to turn the towers to dust?
sparkie72 2 months ago
@offthahook08 Way to be totally undiscriminating. Sure, it could be all theories combined--an excellent way of saying you don't want to weigh any of the evidence critically.
belowthepovertyline 2 months ago
@sparkie72 "Learn about Telsa's many inventions that are hidden from us to keep as enslaved." If they're hidden, how are we supposed to learn about them. Do you know about them? How am I enslaved by a lone physicists inventions, especially if they are hidden, in which case we wouldn't know about them in the first place. And how was the number of burned cars quantified at 1400?
belowthepovertyline 2 months ago