The Worst Jobs in History - The Urban Age - Part 5

Sorry Guys, Its been a while but everyone deserves a treat for no reason... and here it is! To celebrate the fact Ive just become a first home buyer (yay!) Tony is back and indulging in a new compilation of (How should I put this) undesirable lifestyle choices and urban survival is the name of the game. Just be thankful Tonys always doing this stuff and you arent :D Creative Planet, Creative Thinking

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Worst
• Jobs
• History
• Part
• Tony
• Robinson

[guysmiley00]

God bless Tony - he really gets in there and sacrifices to authentically experience the worst jobs in history.

[5000433]

Tony is a good lad.

[stonehengitys81]

@dodico20 You are right, that tool indeed is still in use, I am asphalt worker and I have used that tool many times. But the plate in our tool is much bigger, about size of 25 cm X 20 cm.

[Truthiness231]

Reminded me of Baldrick while he was on the hot pavement; that would be the only Englishman stupid and desperate enough to work in that field.

"Baldrick! Go smooth out that hot ash! And take your bloody shoes off before you do!"

[sewagedweller]

shit , he should have skipped this one . No one would have though less of him .

[dodico20]

@guysmiley00 5:27 is solid evidence . It shows what it should actually look like. The stove size would not be an issue either. they made the bar right? not to mention they had swords, etc. Just manually move the video to 5:27 if you not gonna click it. Then look at the image. You will see how the historical records depict it. If that doesn't settle it for you then your just being stubborn/ignorant. Your making me repeat myself and this is just silly. Debate over/settled.

[guysmiley00]

@dodico20 You have yet to present any evidence in support of your claim of "BS". A larger plate, even with compensation for increased weight, would still cool off faster and require a larger stove to heat. And a smaller diameter bar would provide less area to grip and be more prone to warping and breakage.

I'm not saying you might not be correct - I'm just saying that before you accuse historical experts of "BS", you'd better have more than some unsupported, ill-thought-out fancy as "evidence".

[guysmiley00]

@dodico20 So, because you made a tool once, every iteration of that tool in history must have been precisely the same as your creation? Hey, I once drove a nail with a rock - therefore, this show is inaccurate as all hammers are handle-less pieces of stone.

[dodico20]

@guysmiley00 "Got to love people who think that a simple, ill-considered observation should override hundreds of hours of study" I totally agree with that statement. If you had the slightest clue you would realize that the weight wouldn't be an issue if you upped the surface area of the plate.

If you go to 5:27 and look at the tool, you can clearly see how it should look and how it also has more surface area. When they did the reenactment they messed it up is all. I rest my case.

[dodico20]

@guysmiley00 "Got to love people who think that a simple, ill-considered observation should override hundreds of hours of study" I totally agree with that statement. However that tool is still in use.I have made one to do a small project. I just so happen to be a welder/fabricator among other things by trade. Weight would not be an issue as you could even out the weight by making a smaller diameter bar. They just built in wrong. More surface area seen right here 5:27 and to me that looks right