Peter Schiff takes on Rockefeller, CFR, Rothschild frontman - Dprogram.net

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,974
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 9, 2009

Peter Schiff exchanges blows with Michael Mussa from The Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

More Info @ Dprogram.net: http://dprogram.net/2009/06/09/video-peter-schiff-takes-on-rockefeller-cfr-ro...

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Peter destroyed that fool.

  • Mussa is a liar, to keep drinking his poison, and feeding his PONZI scheme. Where are all the economists? Aren't they supposed to be able to think? Take a test to get in the university because they are 'smarter' than the rest of the sheep? Why is there only a handful of people making simple sence on a simple problem-DEBT has ruined this country.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @HipHopMetaLRockiN420 Yes. I've read about "Red Shield" or Rothschild. The successful originators of money loaned into existence. Interest earned on nothing. The idea was codified into law. Fractional reserve banking is the polite phrase. Thus was born central banking . . . the Federal Reserve is a modern day example.

  • @doverlin have you heard of the house of Rothschild?

  • Anytime you see a shill lying about the economy...type his name and Rockefeller in at the same time. You will quickly learn if he real or not. This Michael Mussa liar works for the CFR and other Rockefeller organizations.

    Wake up people...almost everything on TV is a lie. W ake up and use some critical thinking skills... we might be able to defeat these NWO traitors!!!!

  • he's reading it!!!!

  • You came to your conclusion by taking 7% of $14 trillion, or 7% of GDP. GDP does not equal federal tax revenues. Total Internal Revenue receipts for the whole of the US in 2008 were approx. $2.742 trillion. Therefore, taxes would have to be increased more like 36.5% (if the national debt was only $10 trillion - it's closer to $12 trillion) in order to pay off the national debt over a 10 year period not taking into consideration any deficits over the same period.

  • the gpd is barely larger than the debt

  • Seriously dude...stick to something other than trying to balance the budget. GDP does not equal Federal tax revenues, which you have suggested here.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more