Ron Paul: Corporatism Reason for Bailouts

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 - public markup link - http://tinyurl.com/3fnzyd

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Wall
• Street
• Protest
• Bailout
• October
• Surprise
• McCain
• Obama
• Deriatives
• Ron
• Paul
• HR3997

[HalcyonRain321]

Ron Paul is everywhere, now. Even those fools at FOX "News" who did everything in their power to derail his campaign are featuring him as a prophet and scholar.

It's sickening. Our country has become so apathetic that we've allowed the media circus of flashing lights and dancing polar bears to distract and lull us into accepting the likes of McCain or Obama as legitimate substitutes for great men like Ron Paul and/or Dennis Kucinich for the presidency.

Vote Nader, McKinney, Balwin or Barr.

[deborahmouser]

It's funny, when he was campaigning they wouldn't let him say a word unless they could turn it into a 10 second sound bite that made him sound ludicrous. Now he's being INVITED to CNN to discuss this issue. Isn't that the way it goes?

[god0fgod]

I tried searching for the source of the Mussolini quote and no where on the internet directs me to it.

[democratsaresmart]

RON PAUL , I HAVE A MESSAGE FOR YOU! UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL

NEVER BE A PUSSY COUNTRY!

HOW DO YOU HAVE ENERGY IN A DAYTIME , IF YOU WAKE UP TWICE A NITE

TO TAKE A PISS, WHAT ANTIAGING DRUGS DO YOU TAKE AND HOW IS IT

GOING TO AFFECT CHEMICALS IN UR BRAIN, I MEAN TESTOSTERON LEVEL,

DO YOU TAKE TESTOSTERONE INGECTIONS TO BE A MEN ?

[REVOLTbydesign86]

im pretty sure that man knows more than you ever will about the economy, he is right while you sound like a jackass, you dont understand what is happening to the US. nor do you understand why the bailouts our happening.

[teegees1]

ya mom as shes licking my balls to my asshole

[w6p7a]

Man, you should think about righting a book about this stuff. Then again, who reads books any more?

[SSSLLLAAYYEEERRRR]

And a country is an association of individuals. So what if that association changes? The economy is the sum of individual transactions. So what if that changes. Neither were meant to be static.

[SSSLLLAAYYEEERRRR]

Only the majority has power. Look at gay marriage. If you are not in the majority you might as well not have voted. In a market you never have to associate with someone you did not like and those people could never exert influence over your associations. What do the rich pool their wealth for? To drive out competition until they turn on themselves, maybe. This not a killer but a rejuvenator. The trust will fail, being more concerned with competitors than market demands, opening up competition.

[SSSLLLAAYYEEERRRR]

That is far from the truth. Those societies produced more art and music than most other countries at the time. Leisure time is a signal of prosperity in a society to anthropologist and the amount of culture produced by these societies suggest widespread prosperity.

[jstutz2003]

In those times of market anarchy, there was no middle class. You had your rich, and you had your poor. Do you honestly believe that is the way things should be? At least with government, we have the choice to oust corrupt individuals, though the Ted Stevens race should make anyone scratch their heads. In a truly free market, corrupt rich individuals are much harder to stop. You also have the pooling of wealth which is an economy, and sometimes worse, country killer.