Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Zack Snyder on Watchmen Movie

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,315
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 8, 2007

Zack Snyder talking about the difficulty of pleasing Alan Moore in regards to his Watchmen adaptation. At Comic Con.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (missdoomcookie)

  • Why does he sound so guilty and suspicious? Because he is. He is a mediocre studio plant, and knows it. If he cared what Alan thought he would have PASSED ON THE PROJECT, flat. He wants his cake and to eat it too. But he doesn't really care what Alan thinks, at least not as much as he cares about getting paid and praised. But he's getting praised for shallow reasons, because the people who like his work are shallow. In the end his work is meaningless and redundant, where 'Watchman' is timeless.

  • I disagree. 300 was anything but redundant and hardly meaningless. The Watchman movie may not be the groundbreaking piece of art that the book was, but I think it can still be good.

  • When I said meaningless, I assumed you didn't take the characteristic of idiocy as being a sufficient meaning. Though, as a film in the context of film, being based on a really idiotic comic book, 300 is definitely trivial and insignificant. There may be marginal differences in the gimmicks it employs, but an ugly gimmicky distraction just blends in with the rest. A fart by any name still stinks the same.

  • Frank Miller has consistently pushed the bar in comic books and what they can deliver as a medium, challenging our definitions of the hero and finding new ways for art & storytelling to convey meaning. Just because he doesn't have the god complex that Alan Moore has, doesn't mean his work is insignificant.

  • Yet it would´nt b a Snyder fault anyway, I also think it´s impossible for Warner to not touch the ending w 9/11.

    All others thinking Watchmen will be a disaster, please sign below

  • I don't think it necessarily will. I believe Snyder was incredibly faithful to 300 and from what he has said, he is trying very hard to with Watchmen. So far he has hired real actors, not celebrities, and is promising to keep it in the 80's. So if they do any 9/11 reference, it's not going to be direct, as it will be the wrong time period.

Top Comments

  • I agree with VairedInterest completely. (Why the thumbs down for him?)

    300 was all flash and little to no substance. The dawn of the dead remake was the same case (even George Romero thought so). You can expect this guy to make it mere styilized garbage. Too bad Alan Moore has said he doesn't want to watch it. He didn't like 300 and i feel he could rip this guy to shreds if he ever did get around to seeing it.

see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 'super dooper respect'? This man is apparently 40 yrs old but speaks with an infantile mind . . . .christopher nolan on the hand . . . .

  • Watchmen should never have been made but in saying that I think Snyder did as good a job as was humanly possible to make an unfilmable story into a movie. Sort of like Peter Jackson's attempt at Lord of the Rings.

  • A perfect example of why one should hate the Watchmen movie was Rawshank's obscure monologue that replaced the one we all know so (it is on the opening pages). Horrible. It seems Warner Bros hold true to the ideal that "too many talking heads" is a bad thing in movies.

  • I think Alan Moore would only like the film if it were made exactly as he wanted it.

    300 was a very well made film (superb end credits, too) which actually suffered from being too faithful (the Spartans being almost naked being a particular example of Frank Miller nonsense which Snyder should have changed).

    Some artists, like Moore, don't like others "interpreting" their creations, whereas others, such as myself, awould actually be excited to see what other talents could do with our ideas.

  • He says he "gets it" when it comes to Watchmen. Well, trust me. He doesn't "get it". Plus he has a horrible track record for screwing up the spirit of the source material (deletion of biker gang in Dawn, trite side-story in 300). These movies aren't filmed exceptionally well, either. The craft of setting scenes and drama is replaced with slow motion nonsense.

  • i thought sin city movie was only time i seen a faithfull adaptation...really worked...why cant they treat the watchmen movie the same(direct conversion)??..looks to me like Alan Moore wont get involved coz he knows wots gonna happen to it...seriously...if u created something that good...would u not be disgusted by a bunch a snot-nosed airheads making cheap decisions n ruining your masterpiece while they suck the corparate cock??....i would..and people who dont create things will never get it..

  • Because, MCR are on the Reprise label, a Warner owned (I wont be so polite as to call it "music") recording interest. They are piling on their own products to generate more attention for them through a classic cross promotional tactic. It helps to be AWARE, and I can't endorse this priority enough. Since their first and only priority is to get your money, yours should be to learn what methods they are using to trick you into relinquishing it.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more