Police have no duty to protect
Loading...
Uploaded by davidthardy on Jul 7, 2007
Do police have any legal duty to protect you? Attorneys explore this issue in a clip from "In Search of the Second Amendment," available at www.secondamendmentdocumentary.com
- 103 likes, 4 dislikes
-
Top Comments
All Comments (89)
-
Or NEVER, as in this case shown here.
The government prohibits people from protecting their rights, so that they'll give up their freedoms willingly; those faced with anarchy will always choose tyranny.
-
@tturner000 This is why I argue there is no reason to even have a police force. Other than perhaps to have a 3rd party opinion when small legal claims come about.
-
When seconds count the cops are minutes away....... and have no duty to protect you when they FINALLY do show up....
-
How many kids the police saved during Columbine or Virginia Tech
shootings? None whatsoever! They are there to collect evidence and body bags!
They will wait outside for hours while the killing occurs inside! Because
they might get shot at!
They only “PROTECT AND SERVE” their own asses!!!
-
Then you should say "open carry nut" in quotes, because you're quoting THEM; otherwise it looks like your own words and opinion.
But you're giving cops too much credit when you call them "worthless pigs with badges," because in reality they're NAZIS who seek to impose FASCISM, whereby the people are disarmed, and only the criminals and government have power.
That's why the court ruled that states have no duty to protect us, or to allow us to protect ourselves from others.
-
@SovereignStatesman I open carry and own guns and I was harrased by Lovelass ( during my clinical studies) in albuquerque and called a nut because I belive in the second ammendment. nut is what the pussy liberals and the gutless call us. Nut is what these fucking worthless pigs with badges call us, and they will respond to a call about an open carry nut faster then a call about a robbery.
-
You heard the court, they have NO DUTY to protect, no matter what they SAY.
It's every man for himself.
-
So now you say that a person is a "nut" if they want to be able to exercise their right to protect themselves, when the law says that the cops have NO duty to do so?
You obviously don't believe in a right to live.
- 1:27
Disinformation - Do the police have to protect you?by TheHour6,534 views
- 0:39
AMAZING clip of TOSHER REBBE (must see).by bigmaiven96,302 views
- 5:54
14th Amendment and right to armsby davidthardy5,791 views
- 0:58
Penn & Teller on the 2nd Amendmentby christopherwu626,526 views
- 5:02
Idiot wants to ban guns 2by camelman6255,710 views
- 7:17
In Search of the Second Amendment beginningby davidthardy7,082 views
- 3:00
Ron Paul on the Second Amendment (feat. Rachel)by IntegrityCheck29,866 views
- 6:13
Ex IRS agent tells it like it is part2by nalldavid152,003 views
- 3:30
"Collective right" theory repudiatedby davidthardy3,869 views
- 0:30
Criminals' Easy Access to Guns: What Are You Going to Do?by ProtestEasyGuns1,798 views
- 3:19
In Search of the Second Amendment Amer. Revolution clipby davidthardy1,797 views
- 3:04
POLICE: Know Your Rightsby maelstrom187194,062 views
- 7:45
NH: What to do when cops order camera shutoff?by RidleyReport401,771 views
- 4:25
Arms and the Civil Rights movementby davidthardy1,596 views
- 3:10
TJ shooting on the moveby kariocass66,794 views
- 6:39
The Militarization of Our Policeby puppetgovcom109,991 views
- 1:36
"The Biggest Scam & Cover Up in U.S. History"by StopFascismdotcom22,657 views
- 9:59
4 Lakewood Police Officers ambushed and murdered in cold bloodby stringer25323,721 views
- 3:21
VoiceLive 2 | Getting Started: In Performanceby tcheliconsupport18,615 views
- 1:20
Police SHooting in Plano, TXby UnknownAGENT007540,029 views
a gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone
warhawk357 2 years ago 31
so after this fact is revealed to Americans, then anyone who wants to ban any fire arms,it should be assumed that anti-gun groups work for the criminals.
Fockersnextdoor 3 years ago 23