@amankhan100 READ IT AGAIN. I said, they are a collection of countries. Don't tell me what I wrote. All this proves is YOU need to go to school to be able to read. All these movements are recent events, so what? The name Hindustan was given sometime in the BCE period.
@ComputerGuideByMovie For correction of your historical malfunction you ass hole there is no place called Ummah or Christendom these are the collective nouns representing a community you jerk.If This proves you need to go to school.And by the way,why dont you recall "Shudi and Sanghatan" movements?? Why dont you recall "Hindi , Hindu ,Hindustan" Movement????You might also remember Babri Mosque in 92 and Gujrat massacre in last decade
@amankhan100 You're an idiot. Calling a land which only has a population of Hindus, "land of the Hindus" is not racist. It's the same as Christendom and Ummah (except it's one country, instead of a collection). By the way, I never claimed to be a historian. Learn to read.
@ComputerGuideByMovie Ye you are right you are historically racist. "Hindi Hindu Hindustan" does it remind you of something? "Shudi" and "Sanghatan" Movements ,do they ring a bell ?? I wont go in to the details as you claim to be a historian you can figure out yourself.
@amankhan100 Just for the record, Hindustan is not a racist name. It was given by the Persian Empire (Zoroastrians, not Muslims), one of the biggest empires in existence. It means "Land of the Hindus". Are you telling me that in 600 - 1 BCE, there were other adherents than Hindus living there? It's not a racist name, its a historic name. Learn the difference.
LIFE IS WAR ..............
rahul999415 1 day ago
@ComputerGuideByMovie Ye that proves it again that you are racist since BC, and this continues on till day. You cant deny it JERK!!
amankhan100 5 months ago
@allahtalapala hume hum hai toh kya hum hai tumhe tum ho toh kya tum hoo.....
Rohitsharma497 5 months ago
needs more su-30 mki's
sabistar1 5 months ago
@amankhan100 READ IT AGAIN. I said, they are a collection of countries. Don't tell me what I wrote. All this proves is YOU need to go to school to be able to read. All these movements are recent events, so what? The name Hindustan was given sometime in the BCE period.
ComputerGuideByMovie 5 months ago
@ComputerGuideByMovie For correction of your historical malfunction you ass hole there is no place called Ummah or Christendom these are the collective nouns representing a community you jerk.If This proves you need to go to school.And by the way,why dont you recall "Shudi and Sanghatan" movements?? Why dont you recall "Hindi , Hindu ,Hindustan" Movement????You might also remember Babri Mosque in 92 and Gujrat massacre in last decade
amankhan100 5 months ago
@amankhan100 You're an idiot. Calling a land which only has a population of Hindus, "land of the Hindus" is not racist. It's the same as Christendom and Ummah (except it's one country, instead of a collection). By the way, I never claimed to be a historian. Learn to read.
ComputerGuideByMovie 5 months ago
@ComputerGuideByMovie Ye you are right you are historically racist. "Hindi Hindu Hindustan" does it remind you of something? "Shudi" and "Sanghatan" Movements ,do they ring a bell ?? I wont go in to the details as you claim to be a historian you can figure out yourself.
Peace!
amankhan100 5 months ago
@amankhan100 Just for the record, Hindustan is not a racist name. It was given by the Persian Empire (Zoroastrians, not Muslims), one of the biggest empires in existence. It means "Land of the Hindus". Are you telling me that in 600 - 1 BCE, there were other adherents than Hindus living there? It's not a racist name, its a historic name. Learn the difference.
ComputerGuideByMovie 6 months ago