Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Conspiracy NIST Report Debunked

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,336
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 18, 2009

Original video from WarCrimes911 channel

NIST 9 11 Report Debunked

The 911 Conspiracy Debunking Nykytyne2 WTC Theories Debunked End Of 9/11 Truth Movement Ex Truther World Trade Center Twin Towers Larry Silverstein Building 7. Theory Identifying Hijackers Background Inside Job September 11 United States Government George W. Bush Controlled Demolition Pentagon Plane Flight Missile

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ok well we know that it is pretty strange that a building would fall like that because of office fires alone. no explanation has been given for that. exept nists report which was just shown to be pretty falacious. the only plausible evidence that has been given for it was the nano thermite. and as the video suggested , they had the oprtunity to plant said nano thermite, AND that oportunity can be linked back to the white house through blood. i dont mean to sound like a truther but thats "odd".

  • @ctcole77 Not the Pentagon? Missile is just another Straw Man, 130, maybe not gov't related witnesses? Or just a plane-looking Cruise Missile? What terrible conciseness you utilize. Hasty Generalization Fallacy.

  • @ctcole77 Hmmm.. Ever read Cass Sunstein's paper on Conspiracy Theories about how the Judicial Branch goes hand in hand w/ the Fraud Evidence to qualify and make it credible? Read on the Scott Bigham + Zaccarias Trial Issue w/ the FOIA and the release! 95% was not found. 95%? A few pictures count as 95% of a handful of small debris? CNN only warrants that from RKOwens4 and CNN doesn't bias or get controlled...right. Flight 77 doesn't matter, Straw Man, drones were used on WTC Twin Towers, why

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?

    How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?

    How many of Pilots for 911 Truth's professionals have experience flying a Boeing 767?

  • hahaha! i love how this guy says its all coming to a head, it ends now! hahaha no one has or is investigating anything because all of this is a load of crap. its been nearly 2 years since this video. when does it end?

  • @WarCrime911 I still ROFL at your umbrage about ridiculously miniscule details like shadow analysis, or combustible materials (have you ever BEEN in a meeting room, it's usually big wood tables LOL). And there was NO direct violation of NFPA. And the collapse did NOT meet the test of High Order Damage. But because your script sounds so official, to some it actually sounds like you know what you'r talking about. And then you have the nerve to bring up the BBC and other reports, how pathetic.

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?

    If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?

    If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?

    How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?

    If a postcard could survive the Hindenburg inferno isn't it possible for a passport to survive the WTC collapse?

  • Nice! Thanks for reposting this! Be sure to mirror some of my newer videos going over who had demolition access to the buildings and the connections of the Security companies in the towers before 9/11 as well as NIST connections to SAIC and the subsequent cover-up for the use of nanothermite explosives in the WTC.

  • @weseyedwalk

    Plus, the rich don't care about taking a minor hit. Corporate conglomerates work together to lull us into a false sense of security. They are working for the 'greater good', so a minor setback is essential to their agenda as a whole.

    The towers were built to withstand a plane flying into them, in order to bring them down you have to get at the foundation (base columns) of the buildings. In other words, you'd have to blow charges on those base columns, and voila planned demolition.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more