Blair Lies About Iraq's WMDs
Uploader Comments (neoconhitman)
Top Comments
-
How this despicable war criminal got away with this, is beyond me.
But more incredible was all those MPs that voted for him. It only shows that politicians are the real terrorists.
Video Responses
All Comments (155)
-
If a MP can get a year in prison for lying about expenses? What do we do with this scum?
-
The socialist prime minister in action.
-
whole Iraq scam runs so deep that it's difficult to find a starting point for a discussion. It's always best to stick to the facts, and the facts are, that UN inspector Charles Duelfe stated clearly that after 91 Iraq has not capabilitity to manufacture wmds and that there is NO EVIDENCE for it's existence. Blair is either the stupidest person on earth or knew about it. What he actually did is carried out the policy of the Bilderberg group, IMF and whole biz world. it's bullshit for naive
-
he wants stabbing
-
How this guy has not been assasinated is bewildering!
-
@ZIONISTMAN1 Why is it not in the papers then? The Syrians wouldnt take a risk like that after what we did to the Iraqis. So your either lying or someone lied to you.
-
mmmm...he gassed kurds in the 80s and what the world do...NOTHING..
to busy selling him the weapons to do it...awful what people can do to one another,,,
-
Second biggest asshole on Earth. First prize goes to W Bush of course.
it's obvious why he converted to catholism soon after, confess his crimes and woosh, his conscience and soul is clear
Sweetlittlemystery 9 months ago 3
@Sweetlittlemystery he might think his conscience is clear but man-made rituals and superstitions aren't enough to fool the God he claims to believe in. A God who apparently is all powerfull isn't stupid enough to fall for anyone's confessions or pseudo-religion. Blair lied and killed people. Any God who accepts that isn't worth worrying about.
neoconhitman 9 months ago 2
I am a disciple of tye fact that blair and bush did lie to everyone about the middle est wars, however we cannot know for sure that they lied, its probable but not 100% sure so we cannot put them o trial or whatever both because theyll just deny it but also because we have no way of being sure they were lying
MrJackthelord 1 year ago
@MrJackthelord we can know for sure 100%. Blair asked the British people "to trust him" because he knew stuff he couldn't tell us about. We invaded Iraq and found 0 nukes, 0 active programmes and 0 zero missiles capable of striking the UK within 45 minutes. The dossiers presented by Blair have been proved to be fake. Blair said he knew what Saddam had and it would become clear after the invasion. It did become clear - oil - he is a liar and a war criminal.
neoconhitman 1 year ago 8
According to interrogated Saddam officials his WMD program was moved to Syria.
ZIONISTMAN1 1 year ago
@ZIONISTMAN1 unfortunately I don't think this information is credible. It was either obtained under torture where "there are no WMDs" was not an acceptable answer or these officials simply told the US what they wanted to hear in order to get a visa. There are plenty of officials who have done exactly that. Moving an entire WMD programme would be like moving a car production plant without anyone noticing. "They moved them" is the only explantation Bush-ites can accept for the fairy-tale WMDs.
neoconhitman 1 year ago 2