Contemporary Evidence

Discussing Secular Evidence for the historicity of Jesus Christ

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Atheist
• Agnostic
• Freethought
• brendan
• roberts
• faith
• jesus
• religion
• catholic
• christian
• god
• fact
• history
• Skeptic
• Proof

[migkillertwo]

KT45, I uploaded a response to this video you should see it within the hour and I explain why Tacitus' and Joesphus' mention is valid evidence for jesus.

[KT45]

Awesome thanks!

[preacher4thedeaf]

It seems that "Crosisborg" has disabled commenting. I'd say thats a little suspicious, but.... Has anyone ever checked into the authenticity of the official letters of Pilate to, Seneca, in Rome? There are several other official communications by Pilate to the Roman authorities concerning Jesus. Pilate seemed quite worried about it. These are a matter of Roman history. All you have to do is look!

[KT45]

I see your comments fine. If you find any letters outside the bible dealing with Pilate and jesus please email them to me. Thanks.

[CaramelHottie2]

When you seek with all of your heart like you are doing, God will show you the truth. Even though Christians fall short lke everyone else sometimes more since evil wants to break the bonds to God, but Jesus will prove He was & is, mainly in personal ways like our dreams. Too many ppl don't know that dreams are visions of our state of being and can be confusing or terrifying, but I know for a fact Jesus appeared to me in a dream, and I just knew it was him without question.

[migkillertwo]

explain why being canonized makes a document unreliable.

[overtime2005]

there is NO historical or arch evidence of a so called jesus christ outside of any bible.

[preacher4thedeaf]

Sorry I got you mixed up with someone else. You are correct, you did not say that, but the comment still stands for croisborg. He seemed to be trying add a little to your format. I thought you made some very good points and didn't need his help. I'll see if I can find those letters.

[KT45]

I didn't say that lack of official recording makes it false. I just said that I personally want contemporary evidence. Why do you call me Crosisborg? I don't even have the same voice as him.

[preacher4thedeaf]

You're like "MUJAKU". [This is herd Christianity for the morons.] I'm at a loss here. I can't understand why someone can't just discuss something without spewing hatred and insults. I can only assume that this person is a very hate filled, miserable person who lacks the social skills to make an intelligent comment. And then he lies about the little he DOES know. What is the point of all that?

[preacher4thedeaf]

"Crosisborg" says, Lack of official recording of execution makes it false: There were a lot of people executed in Rome that there was no record of. To make a point that since this official execution would not have gone unrecorded is not accurate at all, far as I can deduce. Many executions were simply listed as transient or vagabond. No name. Like John Doe. Some were not listed at all!