BEAT CHILD SUPPORT www.sittingduck.resortkadavu.com

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,542
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 30, 2008

www.sittingduck.resortkadavu.com LEARN how to hide your ASSETS from Child Support, Divorce, Family Law Courts, Bankruptcy, Court orders

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @angol42 IF THE WOMAN HAS 100% CUSTODY OF THE CHILD where they are together as a family and the man is OUT THE DOOR, THEN WHY SHOULD THE MAN HAVE TO PAY 50% OF CHILD SUPPORT when he does NOT have custody of the child and is NOT living with them? MEN SHOULD NOT PAY ANY AMOUNT TOWARDS CHILD SUPPORT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE CUSTODY. Women who have 100% custody of a child SHOULD PAY 100% OF ALL EXPENSES towards the child. Being a dad but NOT having custody of the child is NOT BEING PART OF THE FAMILY.

  • ONCE UPON A TIME AGO THEY SAID

    WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO MY DAD

    WAS IN MY BEST INTEREST. . .THEY FUCKING LIED.

    We Know What You Have Been Doing To Our Fathers

    In Your Corrupt Family Courts You Sick Mother Fuckers

    This Is A World Wide Plot That Is Illegal; Criminal; And

    Among Other Things Amounts To Be Racketeering; Extortion; And

    Legalised Child Trafficking In Courts Making Merchandise of Children

    And Using Child Custody Awards To Create Sub-Class Citizens With

    Diminished Rights.

  • Wait a mintue - pay 50% costs to whom? The mother? If we assume 50-50 custody then neither parent should pay nothing to the other. One should only pay if, for example you cannot take your kid say 50% of the time.

    Under such a system we would not need family courts ripping off men and all the scumbag lawyers would be out of a job (-:

  • THE EX-HUSBAND shoud only be responsible to pay precisely 50% of neccessary expenses TOWARDS THE CHILD ONLY AND NOT TOWARDS THE EX-WIFE. If the ex-wife cannot afford to pay the other 50% THAT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EX-HUSBAND as they are now 2 seperate single adults because the marraige no longer exists so therefore THE GOVERNMENT should then be responsible to pay the other 50% if the ex-wife cant. MAKE THIS A LAW!!!!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more