@angol42 IF THE WOMAN HAS 100% CUSTODY OF THE CHILD where they are together as a family and the man is OUT THE DOOR, THEN WHY SHOULD THE MAN HAVE TO PAY 50% OF CHILD SUPPORT when he does NOT have custody of the child and is NOT living with them? MEN SHOULD NOT PAY ANY AMOUNT TOWARDS CHILD SUPPORT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE CUSTODY. Women who have 100% custody of a child SHOULD PAY 100% OF ALL EXPENSES towards the child. Being a dad but NOT having custody of the child is NOT BEING PART OF THE FAMILY.
Wait a mintue - pay 50% costs to whom? The mother? If we assume 50-50 custody then neither parent should pay nothing to the other. One should only pay if, for example you cannot take your kid say 50% of the time.
Under such a system we would not need family courts ripping off men and all the scumbag lawyers would be out of a job (-:
THE EX-HUSBAND shoud only be responsible to pay precisely 50% of neccessary expenses TOWARDS THE CHILD ONLY AND NOT TOWARDS THE EX-WIFE. If the ex-wife cannot afford to pay the other 50% THAT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EX-HUSBAND as they are now 2 seperate single adults because the marraige no longer exists so therefore THE GOVERNMENT should then be responsible to pay the other 50% if the ex-wife cant. MAKE THIS A LAW!!!!!!
@angol42 IF THE WOMAN HAS 100% CUSTODY OF THE CHILD where they are together as a family and the man is OUT THE DOOR, THEN WHY SHOULD THE MAN HAVE TO PAY 50% OF CHILD SUPPORT when he does NOT have custody of the child and is NOT living with them? MEN SHOULD NOT PAY ANY AMOUNT TOWARDS CHILD SUPPORT IF HE DOESN'T HAVE CUSTODY. Women who have 100% custody of a child SHOULD PAY 100% OF ALL EXPENSES towards the child. Being a dad but NOT having custody of the child is NOT BEING PART OF THE FAMILY.
domram12 2 months ago
ONCE UPON A TIME AGO THEY SAID
WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO MY DAD
WAS IN MY BEST INTEREST. . .THEY FUCKING LIED.
We Know What You Have Been Doing To Our Fathers
In Your Corrupt Family Courts You Sick Mother Fuckers
This Is A World Wide Plot That Is Illegal; Criminal; And
Among Other Things Amounts To Be Racketeering; Extortion; And
Legalised Child Trafficking In Courts Making Merchandise of Children
And Using Child Custody Awards To Create Sub-Class Citizens With
Diminished Rights.
classaction666 3 months ago 2
Wait a mintue - pay 50% costs to whom? The mother? If we assume 50-50 custody then neither parent should pay nothing to the other. One should only pay if, for example you cannot take your kid say 50% of the time.
Under such a system we would not need family courts ripping off men and all the scumbag lawyers would be out of a job (-:
angol42 4 months ago
THE EX-HUSBAND shoud only be responsible to pay precisely 50% of neccessary expenses TOWARDS THE CHILD ONLY AND NOT TOWARDS THE EX-WIFE. If the ex-wife cannot afford to pay the other 50% THAT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EX-HUSBAND as they are now 2 seperate single adults because the marraige no longer exists so therefore THE GOVERNMENT should then be responsible to pay the other 50% if the ex-wife cant. MAKE THIS A LAW!!!!!!
domram12 10 months ago