Candy Crowley Lies About Ron Paul Polls - 8/14/11

Candy Crowley, on State of the Union, claims that Ron Paul is among the bottom Republican contenders in head to head match-ups against Obama, despite polls to the contrary. This video juxtaposes her lies with the polls that prove her wrong.

The Ron Paul 2012 design at the end of the video can be purchased on stickers, iPhone cases, coffee mugs, etc. at www.zazzle/bobakimbodesigns. 50% of all profits will go to the Ron Paul 2012 Presidential campaign. More designs will be added, so be sure to stop back.

Let's get this brilliant statesman into the White House!

The Revolutions Continues!

• Category

  News & Politics

[dave d]

Ron Paul For President

[theQiwiMan]

HO HO HO JABBA NO BADDA YOUNG JEDI

[Darius Blood]

i j

[Epitaph1334]

What you said made my head hurt. If John McCain was such a strong candidate why didn't he beat Obama ? Even Obama won some Red states in 2008. Ron Paul was for liberty, our constitution, and freedom. He even served military service as a surgeon. How can you call Ron Paul weak ?

[Epitaph1334]

Is it true that Candy Crowley use to be a line backer for the New York Giants ???

[illusionistdave]

It makes absolutely no difference in the elecdtion. This whole argument would only matter if anyone gave a rats ass what she said about the polls. However, she was pointing out a fact. I'm an Independent, and I would never vote for Ron Paul. In fact I WOULD vote for John McCain. Paul is a weak candidate and you just need to realize that.

[Evan Raiewski]

It was a complete and deliberate slight to Ron Paul, declaring arbitrarily the top 3 real republican choices, while his most recent poll results (aka facts) showed him as a legit challenger.

[illusionistdave]

SHe didn't spin anything. They are supposed to ask the hard questions. She asked one and he got pissy about it.

[Evan Raiewski]

What I will restate, and maybe read slower this time, is that you can not excuse her just because it didn't affect an outcome. I'm admitting she didn't affect the outcome because nobody can, but you enable her fat ass when excusing this garbage media simply "because it didn't have an effect." If you think media should be allowed to spin things however they feel and omit real facts, then congratulations- you are the living epitome of "ignorance is bliss."

[Daniel H]

Biased fucking cunt. Fuck the shitheads that employ her

[illusionistdave]

Umm, I"M the one who said that she didn't affect the nominations process, dumbass. And no, Ron Paul just isn't a good candidate and never will be. He's weak, and probably racist.

[Evan Raiewski]

It doesn't matter whether or not it actually affected the outcome, it was a fat, decided omission of truth, by a fat diabetic ho. No one person singlehandedly affects the outcome of the nomination process. If you believe they can, you are the idiot.

The truth is that there was a concerted effort time and time again by major media to omit and ignore Ron Paul, and outcome or not, it was disgusting. Plus this fat ass reporter made it double disgusting