DonExodus2 and the Value of Homework

Straight up evidence on one of the many lies DonExodus is telling over and over in his different videos. This makes it more than obvious that Don could care less about spreading the truth about evolution and would rather lie about the validity of his evolutionary religion. I'm not sure it gets much more 'open and shut' than this.

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/01/06-02.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgyTVT3dqGY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0puoduvfBxA&feature=fvsr

Here's the video with Per Ahlberg discussing the tracks. They're a LOT bigger than I originally thought they were. Here's something for all of you to notice in the video. Even though this discovery completely blows away everything palaeontologists thought they knew about tetrapods notice how Per Ahlberg NEVER sways from the evolutionary worldview. At NO time does he ever stop to think about the potential idea that all of these creatures may have been created all at the same time by a Creator. Everything he sees he ONLY sees from an evolutionary standpoint without regard for any other worldview. Forever the consummate evolutionist.

http://www.nature.com/nature/videoarchive/tetrapods/index.html

Here's a good article for those of you interested in an ID perspective on the tracks.

http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/literature/2010/01/09/lobbing_a_grenade_in...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• creation
• DonExodus
• DonExodus2
• big
• fat
• liar
• lies
• to
• children
• pushing
• an
• agenda
• preys
• on
• the
• lazy
• greedy
• value
• of
• homework
• tiktaalik
• religion

[animefan2k9]

how can life come from nothing?

[gregrutz]

Hate homework?  Is that why you flunked Biology?

[agentorange20]

@Equestions 'you actually believe in punctuated equilibrium'

Not necessarily. As far as if organisms do evolve in more spurts & slow down, or if it's more gradually accumulated is harder to know. Many of the extant studies demonstrate gradualism, while in the fossil record we're only getting a very, very brief snapshot so it's harder to infer the direct linear diversification & increase in biodiversity.

[agentorange20]

@Equestions 'it codes for RNA'

Like I said, cite the paper that shows ERV's create functional proteins or even better yet why they show up in the same loci in entirely, by your creationist accounts, dissimilar, & not related species. ERV's certainty don't code for RNA, the cell itself does that.

[agentorange20]

@Equestions 'OLDEST fossils of pandericthys'

Are dated to ~ 295 MYA, so while they're nearly parallel w/ those footprints I don't see an issue.

'ow appears that tetrapods are OLDER than Pandericthys, Tiktaalik,'

No, it just means they actually took to the shallows & land earlier than previous evidence demonstrated, maybe by some 5 MYA earlier. Fossils always show not the first immediate representatives of their genera.

[agentorange20]

@Equestions 'Do some homework on that and let me know what you find.'

OK, I found that w/ beneficial mutations which increase the fitness of the organism, say like nylonase in which they can now digest nylon, the mutations are preserved & passed onto successive descendants. That is what actually happens.

[Equestions]

@agentorange20 Wow....OK. It's clear you really don't understand how this all works. I would invite you to ask yourself this one simple question. "What actually happens when a 'beneficial' mutation occurs in the genome." Do some homework on that and let me know what you find. I think you'll be surprised at what 'beneficial' mutations actually do.

[Equestions]

@agentorange20 Not true. I'm asking you if you actually believe in punctuated equilibrium. If the answer is 'yes' then I want you to explore just how irrational that is when using the evidence in today's observed world.

[Equestions]

@agentorange20 They're finding it codes for RNA and what was once 3% functional genome is turning out to be closer to 30% functional genome....and they're just getting started according to the ENCODE project.

[Equestions]

@agentorange20 And here we go again. The problem is, now that they found 395myo tetrapod tracks, the OLDEST fossils of pandericthys, Tiktaalik, and Acanthostega are now found AFTER the oldest tetrapod tracks. Do you see the conundrum here? Pandericthys, Tiktaalik, and Acanthostega were all supposed to be 'transitional' from fish to tetrapods but you can no longer prove that to be true since it now appears that tetrapods are OLDER than Pandericthys, Tiktaalik, and Acanthostega.