Is Racial Pride Irrational?
Uploader Comments (LaughingMan0X)
Top Comments
-
Wow, Tooltime9901 got completely owned.
-
You are good at pointing at logical fallacies.
All Comments (601)
-
@thegillotine09 Exactly. Using the economic value of *exhibiting* a sentiment in order to acquire gratification is not what is disputed to be rational.
-
"did you just imply that the colonization of Africa resulted in the abolition of slavery? Just think about that for a second"
He did. Now how 'bout you go and think about it for more than one second?
-
Wait wait...did you just imply that the colonization of Africa resulted in the abolition of slavery? Just think about that for a second...
Oh and of course pride is a good thing but it is also a double edged sword and when you combine pride with racial heritage you're only walking a dark path.
What is there to celebrate about race? A race is just a genetic variation of a the same species if you're going to celebrate anything it should be the accomplishments of the HUMAN race.
-
you can't assign a single numerical value for the 'benefit' of attending a racial pride parade. it could be different for different people--for some it could be 10, for some it could be 9, and so on... .and for some it could be 0... and for some it could even be negative considering the social, personal, financial, political, etc. backlash that they have to deal with after attending racial pride parades.
-
actually, in Japan, they do no discriminate just against whites, they discriminate against outsiders.
-
oh, and another thing, why in the hell do you hear black people (not that I have anything against them) complain about slavery that happened more than a hundred years ago, and use it as a way to attack whites, when people like the Jews, who faced fucking genocide no less, don't attack Germans or Italians for it?
-
I fucking hate race debates. However, this video is great, and needs more views. Its impossible to have a fair argument for race, because one will, no matter what, be somehow swayed to favoring one side. that's why I say we need to flow a little more, and people need to be able to express pride in their race or heritage, at last to the point where it starts to be offensive. I'd love to have a white pride march or where something that expressed pride, but I'd get hammered as a racist. It's sad.
-
Race? you're a moron.
-
Benefit of going to church: 10 utils.
Economic costs: none
Time costs: 1 hour.
Effort costs: low
Risk cost: very low
Conclusion: Religion is rational.
I was with you until 11:00. Then it just got mind-blowingly fucking stupid. Seriously, I don't even know where to begin.
genericaccounr 4 months ago
@genericaccounr
Howsabout making an actual argument instead of name-calling. That's typically how adults settle matters in epistemic dispute.
LaughingMan0X 4 months ago
I think you edit this video to remove the citation from the National Policy Institute because being associated with their studies is the most compelling argument that you are a racist that anyone could make.
TheIlluminerdi 5 months ago
@TheIlluminerdi
1) What the hell are you talking about? I said the study was from the NPI explicitly in the video. Furthermore, the citation to the NPI study is in the video description.
2) I wasn't aware that guilt by association was a valid argument; thanks for correcting me. Oh wait......
LaughingMan0X 5 months ago
@LaughingMan0X
1. Sorry, I accidentally omitted the word "should" from sentence ("I think you SHOULD edit"). It was a bad typo.
2. Guilt by association has various degrees of rationality. You citing the study isn't a terribly compelling argument, but one could interpret it to mean that you actively read their literature. They ARE a hate group and I say that unequivocally. I don't know enough information—You could simply have googled it—but it doesn't bode well to cite such a study.
TheIlluminerdi 5 months ago
@TheIlluminerdi
2A) No, guilt by association doesn't degrees of (epistemic) rationality, it is a logical fallacy plain & simple. Also, how do you infer from the fact that I cite one of their studies that therefore I haven't read their literature? That's a total non-sequitur and seems wrong prima facie.
The term "hate group" is little more then defamation which is often used to poison the well (if I call your group a hate group, then I can dismiss what they say w/o addressing your argument).
LaughingMan0X 5 months ago